Re: [Rd] R 4.0.1-4.0.5 built with Intel Composer 19.0-19.1.1, errors in "make check" on CentOS 7.7-7.9

2021-04-16 Thread Ryan Novosielski
> On Apr 16, 2021, at 2:32 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:06:51 + > Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> Well it definitely somehow could have, since it did > > Wow! This is strange, but at least it should be easy to fix. Try editing > the config.site file in the root of the R s

Re: [Rd] R Console Bug?

2021-04-16 Thread Simon Urbanek
Sorry, unable to reproduce on macOS, in R console: > dyn.load("test.so") > .Call("printtest",1e4L) Processing data chunk 1 of 3 [==] 100% Processing data chunk 2 of 3 [==] 100% Processing data chunk 3 of 3 [==

Re: [Rd] R 4.0.1-4.0.5 built with Intel Composer 19.0-19.1.1, error in "make check" on CentOS 7.7-7.9

2021-04-16 Thread Ryan Novosielski
> On Apr 16, 2021, at 2:32 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote: > > On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:06:51 + > Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> Well it definitely somehow could have, since it did > > Wow! This is strange, but at least it should be easy to fix. Try editing > the config.site file in the root of the R s

Re: [Rd] R 4.0.1-4.0.5 built with Intel Composer 19.0-19.1.1, error in "make check" on CentOS 7.7-7.9

2021-04-16 Thread Ivan Krylov
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 18:06:51 + Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Well it definitely somehow could have, since it did Wow! This is strange, but at least it should be easy to fix. Try editing the config.site file in the root of the R source directory and setting R_C_STACK_DIRECTION=down there. (Make s

Re: [Rd] R 4.0.1-4.0.5 built with Intel Composer 19.0-19.1.1, error in "make check" on CentOS 7.7-7.9

2021-04-16 Thread Ryan Novosielski
> On Apr 16, 2021, at 12:12 PM, Ivan Krylov wrote: > > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 22:46:56 + > Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> (gdb) print $_siginfo._sifields._sigfault >> $1 = { >> si_addr = 0x7f7fecf8, _addr_lsb = 0, >> _addr_bnd = {_lower = 0x9215f829ff58, _upper = 0x7f7fecf8} >> } >

Re: [Rd] R 4.0.1-4.0.5 built with Intel Composer 19.0-19.1.1, error in "make check" on CentOS 7.7-7.9

2021-04-16 Thread Ivan Krylov
On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 22:46:56 + Ryan Novosielski wrote: > (gdb) print $_siginfo._sifields._sigfault > $1 = { > si_addr = 0x7f7fecf8, _addr_lsb = 0, > _addr_bnd = {_lower = 0x9215f829ff58, _upper = 0x7f7fecf8} > } > (gdb) print R_CStackDir * (R_CStackStart - (uintptr_t)&codebase)

Re: [Rd] problem adding gdb to RTOOLS40 on Windows

2021-04-16 Thread Jeroen Ooms
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:19 AM Bravington, Mark (Data61, Hobart) wrote: > > Excellent, thank you all. Doing "pacman -Syu" before "pacman -S gdb" did > the trick, and yes it's a different version of gdb compared to what pacman > was previously trying to install. Might be worth updating the

[Rd] R Console Bug?

2021-04-16 Thread Morgan Morgan
Hi, I am getting a really weird behaviour with the R console. Here is the code to reproduce it. 1/ C code: --- SEXP printtest(SEXP x) { const int PBWIDTH = 30, loop = INTEGER(x)[0]; int val, lpad; double perc; char PBSTR[PBWIDTH], PBOUT[PBW

[Rd] R 4.1.0 scheduled for May 18

2021-04-16 Thread Peter Dalgaard via R-devel
Full schedule is available on developer.r-project.org. -- Peter Dalgaard, Professor, Center for Statistics, Copenhagen Business School Solbjerg Plads 3, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark Phone: (+45)38153501 Office: A 4.23 Email: pd@cbs.dk Priv: pda...@gmail.com __