raight up
> an
> >>> error by the script author. I think its a few of them, actually, but
> its at
> >>> least one. An understandable one, sure, but thats still what it is.
> Scripts
> >>> (which are meant to be run more than once, generally) usually shouldn't
> >&
know.
P.S. if this change happened, it would be interesting to study the effect
it has on the bandwidth across all CRAN mirrors. A significant drop would
turn into actual $$ saved
Josh Bradley
On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 5:00 AM Duncan Murdoch
wrote:
> On 08/11/2019 2:06 a.m., Joshua Bradley wro
Hello,
Currently if you install a package twice:
install.packages("testit")
install.packages("testit")
R will build the package from source (depending on what OS you're using)
twice by default. This becomes especially burdensome when people are using
big packages (i.e. lots of depends) and
I'm not trying to create a mirror of the CRAN. I also do not want to create
a "subset" of CRAN packages. Sorry if my explanation was confusing. There
are internal proprietary R packages that I would like to host on a private
repo. I like the CRAN web pages that allow a user to browse the various
Hello,
I have been having issues using parallel::mclapply in a memory-efficient
way and would like some guidance. I am using a 40 core machine with 96 GB
of RAM. I've tried to run mclapply with 20, 30, and 40 mc.cores and it has
practically brought the machine to a standstill each time to the
How would this new '+' deal with factors, as paste does or as the current
'+'
does? Would number+string and string+number cause errors (as in current
'+' in R and python) or coerce both to strings (as in current R:paste and
in perl's '+').
I had posted this sample code previously to
Hi, first time poster here. During my time using R, I have always found
string concatenation to be (what I feel is) unnecessarily complicated by
requiring the use of the paste() or similar commands.
When searching for how to concatenate strings in R, several top search
results show answers that
, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Gabriel Becker gmbec...@ucdavis.edu
wrote:
On Jun 16, 2015 3:44 PM, Joshua Bradley jgbradl...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, first time poster here. During my time using R, I have always found
string concatenation to be (what I feel is) unnecessarily complicated by
requiring
One of the poster's on the SO post I linked to previously suggested this
but if '+' were made to be S4 compliant, then adding the ability to concat
strings with '+' would be a relatively simple addition (no pun intended) to
the code base I believe. With a lot of other languages supporting this
