to be compiled? This is only happening on one of my systems.
Building R and make check work fine on that system, but it seems that
not all the information gets passed along to package compiles.
(BTW, this is just a warning, but Kurt suggested we try to eliminate
warnings.)
Paul Gilbert
Prof Brian Ripley
Doug
I do indeed have a Makevars file after all. Thanks for spelling out the
interpretation of the warning message.
Paul
Douglas Bates wrote:
On 9/25/06, Paul Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am still confused about this (and it is still happening with R-beta).
Writing R Extensions
When I build one of my packages with alpha from yesterday I am getting
* checking for portable use of $BLAS_LIBS ... WARNING
apparently missing $(FLIBS) in 'PKG_LIBS=$(LAPACK_LIBS) $(BLAS_LIBS)'
Is this something I should worry about? (Possibly I got this before and
didn't notice.)
Paul
be nice to have some place users would expect
to find this information. However, changing the meaning of Suggests to
be developer defined does not strike me as an improvement.
Paul Gilbert
Duncan Murdoch
Martin
FrL Ad the wording in the manual: obviously that is not
FrL optimal
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 8/30/2006 12:28 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 8/30/2006 4:44 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
FrL == friedrich leisch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Wed, 30 Aug 2006 09:34:13 +0200 (MEST) writes:
Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think we
provide another feature, etc, etc.
Alternatives to 'canMakeUseOf' would have been
'isHappilyCoworkingWith'
What do you (R-devel listeners) think about the idea?
I still like this idea. I prefer 'canMakeUseOf' to
'isHappilyCoworkingWith' mainly because it seems less ambiguous.
Paul Gilbert
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 8/29/2006 10:12 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
PaulG == Paul Gilbert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tue, 29 Aug 2006 09:55:09 -0400 writes:
PaulG Martin Maechler wrote:
...
The idea was a field related to but weaker than
'Suggests' :
Something
Seth Falcon wrote:
Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 8/29/2006 11:58 AM, Seth Falcon wrote:
I think there is an important distinction between a dependency needed
for the package to function and a dependency needed to demonstrate
said functionality via an example or vignette.
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 8/29/2006 2:24 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
Seth Falcon wrote:
Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 8/29/2006 11:58 AM, Seth Falcon wrote:
I think there is an important distinction between a dependency needed
for the package to function
I was just considering trying to clean up the arguments to a function
that calls other functions,
and was playin with a suggestion Achim made during a conversation at
useR. The idea is, instead of using list(), use a small function to
construct and check arguments. My hope was to be able to do
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 6/30/2006 5:12 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 6/30/2006 4:19 PM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
I was just considering trying to clean up the arguments to a
function that calls other functions,
and was playin with a suggestion Achim made during
I've been following this thread hoping for the definitive answer...
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Well, I do tend to think that we should just use utf, assuming that
people have the relevant glyphs. If they don't, then they might get
little hollow rectangles but so what?
My problem is that I
Iago
There is a problem that bundle checking works slightly differently than
individual package checking in this regard. I think it has to do with
when the namespace gets registered, or something like that. As I recall,
the work around is to explicitely require the package in the test files
is necessary for bundle check to run examples,
# but does not seem to be necessary when packages are not bundled
require(tframe)
invisible(TRUE)
}
Hope this works,
Paul
Iago Mosqueira wrote:
-Mensaje original-
De: Paul Gilbert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: jue 22
I am getting several errors about Windows only packages when I use task
views. Is this suppose to be a Windows-centric utility?
Also, I am sure there must be a simple way to tell which packages are in
a view, but I haven't found it. If there isn't, it would be nice to have.
Paul Gilbert
MCMCpack. Perhaps my systems are messed up?
Paul Gilbert
install.packages(MCMCpack)
Warning in install.packages(MCMCpack) : argument 'lib' is missing:
using /home/mfa/gilp/toolchain/R/asd05546/R-2.3.1/site-library
--- Please select a CRAN mirror for use in this session ---
Selection: 3
trying
I think the more usual way to solve this is to have the user set
par(ask=TRUE) is they want to be prompted. This gives the user the
option of being prompted, or not. It makes the example tests work, and
simplifies your code because you don't need to worry about the prompt
mechanism. It also
, the compiler will take
precedence
configure: WARNING: ## --- ##
configure: WARNING: ## Report this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ##
configure: WARNING: ## --- ##
checking for complex.h... yes
Paul Gilbert
Kevin
The developers page is available from the left side menu frame on the
main R page http://www.r-project.org/ , but not from CRAN.
(BTW, R-devel does not have nearly as much traffic as R-help, so digest
mode may not be so important.)
Paul Gilbert
Kevin B. Hendricks wrote:
Hi,
I just
/R-2.3.0PGI/src'
make: *** [R] Error 1
Any help would be appreciated.
Paul Gilbert
La version française suit le texte anglais
C appears to be an illegal name for a slot in an S4 class (example
below). If this is a known limitation, and not a bug, it would be nice
if it were caught by setClass.
Paul Gilbert
setClass(testobj, representation ( C = numeric))
[1] testobj
new(testobj, C= 2)
Error
.
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Paul Gilbert wrote:
C appears to be an illegal name for a slot in an S4 class (example
below).
It is rather an example of something which does not work.
foo - new(testobj)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - 2
does, for example.
If this is a known limitation, and not a bug
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Mon, 17 Apr 2006, Paul Gilbert wrote:
Ok, but I'm surprised. I thought partial matching only happened for
named arguments. I guess I've been lucky.
Here C is named, so what did you mean?
Now I guess I've really been confused. I thought named arguments
I am having the xmkmf problem below with todays beta, but I also am
trying to use an new (PGI 6.1), so lots of other things in my setup may
be wrong, and the warning may also be important. Any hints would be
appreciated.
Paul
_
Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS release 3 (Taroon Update 7)
When I use
package?pac
the author field gets reproduced twice, once with the \author{ } string
and a secod time formatted.
Also, would it be possible to make package?pac find the overview
without the package being attached, or at least give a more informative
error message.
Paul
Iago
What you are trying to do should work, but there are a couple of things
to watch out for. In the bundle DESCRIPTION Contains line be sure to
put the packages in the order that they should be checked. In the R
code for package B be sure to put an .onload function with
requires(A), or
Doug
This is probably not your reason, but I am finding my dual core Athlon
64 is much slower running 64 bit Linux and R than it was running 32 bit
Linux and R. All the programs are bigger. (Some, like the clock applet,
are a lot bigger for no obvious reason.) The difference is enough to
to begin.
Of course, the biggest simplification happens when things like this are
done in a similar way by everyone. ( configure ; make is not
intuitively simple, but everyone now knows the incantation.)
Paul Gilbert
In the file factanal.Rd the line
then the first fit is started at the value suggested by J\ureskog
should be
then the first fit is started at the value suggested by
\enc{J\ureskog}{Joreskog}
or whatever that translates to on a system that does not mangle cut and
paste of
, Paul Gilbert wrote:
I am trying to put an ouml in an .Rd file with no success. Writing R
Extensions suggests:
Text which might need to be represented differently in different
encodings should be marked by |\enc|, e.g. |\enc{Jöreskog}{Joreskog}|
where the first argument will be used where
suggest
sticking with the current non-specific structure for the return value.
(For piecewise linear or other non-linear analysis there may be good
reasons to allow more general structures for the loadings.)
Paul Gilbert
__
R-devel@r-project.org
with a fairly clean test environment. What
happens when other packages are attached? Where/how does it break when
there are other packages attached that need conflicting generics (or can
that actually work)?
Thanks,
Paul
Kurt Hornik wrote:
Paul Gilbert writes:
In R-2.2.0, how does checking S3
the feature behaves slightly differently as of
R-2.2.0. Now the 00LOCK file is not removed in Solaris when there is an
unsuccessful install. (In Linux I think it does get removed.)
Paul Gilbert
After a *successful* installation, the 00LOCK directory should be
deleted by the installation tools
Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 9/19/2005 10:01 AM, Paul Gilbert wrote:
Martin Maechler wrote:
I've changed the subject in the hope some more people would
voice an opinion...
...
Now I even propose to have
options(add.smooth = TRUE)
as a new default.
Do I get a reaction
. In a Monte Carlo experiment the generated
data set is just too big. A better approach is to do the analysis and
save only necessary information after each simulation. That is the
approach, for example, in dse2:::EstEval.
Paul
Paul Gilbert wrote:
Can the arguments nsim and seed be passed as part
Could loadings() in R-2.2.0 please be made generic?
Thanks,
Paul Gilbert
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
Could acf() in R-2.2.0 please be made generic?
Thanks,
Paul Gilbert
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
. There are contexts where nsim and seed do not make
sense. I realize that the default arguments could be ignored, but it
does not really make sense to introduce a new generic with that in mind.
(I would also prefer that the object argument was called model but
this is less important.)
Paul Gilbert
201 - 238 of 238 matches
Mail list logo
