I think that, also in R core, it is well recognized that it is unfortunate
design that some formula manipulation tools rely on going via textual
representation of the entire formula.
I'd be strongly tempted to replace the current reformulate() with something
like this
> x <- c("a
So here is it as txt file. It is funny that a R file is restricted in
R-devel mailing list.
Anyhow, in this case R-core have a few choices here:
* ignore my solution
* show that it is actually bad or worse
* consider adding it
Considering, that it is a minor change from previous version
> Ben Bolker
> on Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:51:33 -0400 writes:
> Your file didn't make it through the mailing list (which is quite
> restrictive about which types/extensions it will take).
> I appreciate your enthusiasm and persistence for this issue, but I
> suspect you
Your file didn't make it through the mailing list (which is quite
restrictive about which types/extensions it will take).
I appreciate your enthusiasm and persistence for this issue, but I
suspect you may have trouble convincing R-core to adopt your changes --
they are "better", "easier",
Hi,
Sorry for writing this late, I was very busy. I started this discussion
here. I wish I could write to bugs.r-project.org, but I don't have an
account and I will write here instead.
Meanwhile, I solved my problem with a simpler fix (please see attached
file)/.
/
This requires that term
> Ben Bolker
> on Thu, 4 Apr 2019 12:46:37 -0400 writes:
> Proposed patch
Thank you Ben!
[the rest is technical nit-picking .. but hopefully interesting
to the smart R-devel reader base:]
There was a very subtle thinko in your patch which is not easily
diagnosed from R's
Proposed patch (I think .txt files work OK as attachments to the list?)
On 2019-04-04 2:21 a.m., Martin Maechler wrote:
>> Ben Bolker
>> on Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:34:50 -0400 writes:
>
> > I suspect that the issue is addressed (obliquely) in the examples,
> > which shows
> Ben Bolker
> on Fri, 29 Mar 2019 12:34:50 -0400 writes:
> I suspect that the issue is addressed (obliquely) in the examples,
> which shows that variables with spaces in them (or otherwise
> 'non-syntactic', i.e. not satisfying the constraints of legal R symbols)
>
I suspect that the issue is addressed (obliquely) in the examples,
which shows that variables with spaces in them (or otherwise
'non-syntactic', i.e. not satisfying the constraints of legal R symbols)
can be handled by protecting them with backticks (``)
## using non-syntactic names:
The main thing is to post the "small reproducible example".
My (rather long term experience) can be written
if (exists("reproducible example") ) {
DeveloperFixHappens()
} else {
NULL
}
JN
On 2019-03-29 11:38 a.m., Saren Tasciyan wrote:
> Well, first I can't sign in bugzilla
Well, first I can't sign in bugzilla myself, that is why I wrote here
first. Also, I don't know if I have the time at the moment to provide
tests, multiple examples or more. If that is not ok or welcomed, that is
fine, I can come back, whenever I have more time to properly report the bug.
I
> Saren Tasciyan
> on Thu, 28 Mar 2019 17:02:10 +0100 writes:
> Hi,
> I have found a bug in reformulate function and have a solution for it. I
> was wondering, where I can submit it?
> Best,
> Saren
Well, you could have given a small reproducible example
Hi,
I have found a bug in reformulate function and have a solution for it. I
was wondering, where I can submit it?
Best,
Saren
--
Saren Tasciyan
/PhD Student / Sixt Group/
Institute of Science and Technology Austria
Am Campus 1
3400 Klosterneuburg, Austria
13 matches
Mail list logo
