Thank you all for clarifying that bug in my understanding! I suppose
that I expected 'a' to be promoted to a list when indexed from NULL.
I will be more judicious in the future when I post.
Daniel Wilhelm
>On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Daniel Wilhelm wrote:
>
>>I believe that I may have found a bug in
PD> Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
PBR> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Daniel Wilhelm wrote:
>>> I believe that I may have found a bug in R. The top code sample
gives
PBR> You have 'merely' found a bug in your understanding.
PBR> What type did you expect 'a' to be? If you expec
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Daniel Wilhelm wrote:
>
>
>> I believe that I may have found a bug in R. The top code sample gives
>>
>
> You have 'merely' found a bug in your understanding. What type did you
> expect 'a' to be? If you expected a list, that is not what ha
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Daniel Wilhelm wrote:
> I believe that I may have found a bug in R. The top code sample gives
You have 'merely' found a bug in your understanding. What type did you
expect 'a' to be? If you expected a list, that is not what happens in the
first example, and you need
a <-
Daniel Wilhelm wrote:
> I believe that I may have found a bug in R. The top code sample gives
> an error as shown. However, by simply switching which field is
> initialized first as in the bottom code sample, it works as expected.
>
>
> This gives an error:
>
>
> a <- NULL
> a[["field1"]] <- 1
>
I believe that I may have found a bug in R. The top code sample gives
an error as shown. However, by simply switching which field is
initialized first as in the bottom code sample, it works as expected.
This gives an error:
a <- NULL
a[["field1"]] <- 1
a[["field2"]] <- matrix(c(2,1), 1)
Erro
