This has been addressed in current R-alpha, thanks! H.
On 09/29/2010 02:11 PM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi,
I can confirm that most of those strange R CMD build/check errors
we observe on Windows are actually a consequence of the temp
Rscript file collision I reported yesterday here:
Hi,
I can confirm that most of those strange R CMD build/check errors
we observe on Windows are actually a consequence of the temp
Rscript file collision I reported yesterday here:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-September/058648.html
I just applied the following patch to the R
Hi,
Something I should mention too, and I don't know whether it is
related to the 'R CMD' confusion issue I described previously,
is that with the migration from Perl-based to R-based 'R CMD build',
we also started to see the following 'R CMD build' error on Windows:
R\bin\R.exe CMD build
On 09/14/2010 11:23 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi Uwe,
On 09/14/2010 04:49 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
...
Brian had some ideas that the problems are related to the shell that is
used. Is the problem still apparent in a very recent R-devel from few
days ago? I am just back from vacations and have not
On 12.09.2010 12:10, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 09/12/2010 01:51 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
On 09/12/2010 08:10 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
...
AFAICT those problems were never seen before (i.e. with R 2.12).
They show up randomly everyday for a small number of packages
(between 10 and 20
Hi Uwe,
On 09/14/2010 04:49 AM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 12.09.2010 12:10, Hervé Pagès wrote:
Hi Peter,
On 09/12/2010 01:51 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
On 09/12/2010 08:10 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
...
AFAICT those problems were never seen before (i.e. with R 2.12).
They show up randomly everyday
Hi,
This is a follow up to:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2010-July/057921.html
The Bioconductor daily builds have been reporting a lot of strange
things lately on Windows using R-2.12. This started 2 or 3 months
ago and things are not getting better with recent R-2.12.
Here is a
On 09/12/2010 08:10 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
...
AFAICT those problems were never seen before (i.e. with R 2.12).
They show up randomly everyday for a small number of packages
(between 10 and 20 out of 400). The set of victims changes everyday
and any package seems to be a potential victim
Hi Peter,
On 09/12/2010 01:51 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
On 09/12/2010 08:10 AM, Hervé Pagès wrote:
...
AFAICT those problems were never seen before (i.e. with R 2.12).
They show up randomly everyday for a small number of packages
(between 10 and 20 out of 400). The set of victims changes
