> Rainer Hurling
> on Sun, 6 Sep 2015 08:40:13 +0200 writes:
> Am 05.09.2015 um 19:09 schrieb peter dalgaard:
>>
>>> On 05 Sep 2015, at 13:54 , Rainer Hurling
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 05.09.2015 um 10:18 schrieb peter dalgaard:
> On 05 Sep 201
Am 05.09.2015 um 19:09 schrieb peter dalgaard:
>
>> On 05 Sep 2015, at 13:54 , Rainer Hurling wrote:
>>
>> Am 05.09.2015 um 10:18 schrieb peter dalgaard:
>>>
On 05 Sep 2015, at 08:28 , Rainer Hurling wrote:
Is there any reason that the R-devel tarball at [1] stucks on r69202?
> On 05 Sep 2015, at 13:54 , Rainer Hurling wrote:
>
> Am 05.09.2015 um 10:18 schrieb peter dalgaard:
>>
>>> On 05 Sep 2015, at 08:28 , Rainer Hurling wrote:
>>>
>>> Is there any reason that the R-devel tarball at [1] stucks on r69202?
>>>
>>> It seems, that newer R-devel versions are now pu
Am 05.09.2015 um 10:18 schrieb peter dalgaard:
>
>> On 05 Sep 2015, at 08:28 , Rainer Hurling wrote:
>>
>> Is there any reason that the R-devel tarball at [1] stucks on r69202?
>>
>> It seems, that newer R-devel versions are now published on
>> /pub/misc/cran/src/base-prerelease, for example at
>
> On 05 Sep 2015, at 08:28 , Rainer Hurling wrote:
>
> Is there any reason that the R-devel tarball at [1] stucks on r69202?
>
> It seems, that newer R-devel versions are now published on
> /pub/misc/cran/src/base-prerelease, for example at
> http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/misc/cran/, but without an R
Is there any reason that the R-devel tarball at [1] stucks on r69202?
It seems, that newer R-devel versions are now published on
/pub/misc/cran/src/base-prerelease, for example at
http://ftp5.gwdg.de/pub/misc/cran/, but without an R-devel.tar.gz
tarball ...
Is this intended? Any clarification wou