[Rd] Package names

2009-09-03 Thread Hadley Wickham
Currently, writing R extensions states: The ‘Package’ and ‘Version’ fields give the name and the version of the package, respectively. The name should consist of letters, numbers, and the dot character and start with a letter. Now that _ is no longer an assignment operator, could it be added to

Re: [Rd] Package names

2009-09-03 Thread Kurt Hornik
Hadley Wickham writes: Currently, writing R extensions states: The ‘Package’ and ‘Version’ fields give the name and the version of the package, respectively. The name should consist of letters, numbers, and the dot character and start with a letter. Now that _ is no longer an assignment

Re: [Rd] Package names

2009-09-03 Thread Hadley Wickham
Currently, writing R extensions states: The ‘Package’ and ‘Version’ fields give the name and the version of the package, respectively. The name should consist of letters, numbers, and the dot character and start with a letter. Now that _ is no longer an assignment operator, could it be

Re: [Rd] Package names

2009-09-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
Hadley Wickham wrote: Currently, writing R extensions states: The ‘Package’ and ‘Version’ fields give the name and the version of the package, respectively. The name should consist of letters, numbers, and the dot character and start with a letter. Now that _ is no longer an assignment

Re: [Rd] Package names

2009-09-03 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
2009/9/3 Uwe Ligges lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de: Hadley Wickham wrote: Currently, writing R extensions states: The ‘Package’ and ‘Version’ fields give the name and the version of the package, respectively. The name should consist of letters, numbers, and the dot character and start