On Apr 29, 2009, at 5:55 , Atro Tossavainen wrote:
(This is really in response to Peter Dalgaard, not to myself)
This seems to come from constructions of the form
for i in $FOO : do ; done
If $FOO is empty, then the resulting "for i in ;" is a syntax error
with some versions of bash an
(This is really in response to Peter Dalgaard, not to myself)
> This seems to come from constructions of the form
>
> for i in $FOO : do ; done
>
> If $FOO is empty, then the resulting "for i in ;" is a syntax error
> with some versions of bash and sh.
Given that one should generally be wr
Many thanks to Peter for the explanation. I found that the fix for
me was to set the environment variable R_SHELL to '/usr/bin/bash',
otherwise (on my AIX system at least) the shell being used was
/bin/sh.
Darin
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 10:54:31AM -0500, Darin England wrote:
> I have the same pro
Darin A. England wrote:
> I have the same problem trying build R 2.9.0 on AIX using the IBM
> Visual Age compilers and GNU make. I'm trying to figure it out, but
> any hints on a fix are greatly appreciated.
This seems to come from constructions of the form
for i in $FOO : do ; done
If $F
I have the same problem trying build R 2.9.0 on AIX using the IBM
Visual Age compilers and GNU make. I'm trying to figure it out, but
any hints on a fix are greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Darin
gmake[2]: Entering directory `/home/denglan/R/builddir/src/library/methods'
building package 'methods'
mk
I've successfully built R 2.9.0 on Linux (amd64, i386 and ppc), but am
having a bit of trouble with legacy boxen. What should have gone into
the variable that is empty at the time it is used in "for f in $SOMETHING"
and why does it end up being empty?
Solaris 8 with Sun Studio 11 compilers:
buil
