On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, kamil Marcinkowski wrote:
> Hello List, Prof Brian Ripley
>
> How would the inefficiencies in IEC60559 arithmetic handling affect a user,
> Slow computations or compromised data and calculations?
Just a loss of accuracy. There have been systems in which using extreme
values
Hello List, Prof Brian Ripley
How would the inefficiencies in IEC60559 arithmetic handling affect a
user,
Slow computations or compromised data and calculations?
Here are the last 50 lines of the reg-tests-1.Rout.fail file.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:70# tail -50 reg-tests-1.Rout.fail
> > ## first tw
The perl-related warnings have gone in R-devel: we now take the view that
since we need perl to make the test suite, perl >= 5.8.0 is compulsory.
(5.6.1 is now over 7 years' old, and 5.8.0 is more than 5.)
The make check failure is in reg-tests-1.R and so will show up in
reg-tests-1.Rout.fail.
Hello list
Thank you for your help with the d-p-q-r-tests on Irix.
After patching d-p-q-r-tests.R, and d-p-q-r-tests.Rout.save file to
reflect the
change, d-p-q-r tests succeed but make check still fails:
> comparing 'complex.Rout' to './complex.Rout.save' ...188c188
> < [1] 0+0i
> ---
> > [1
Hello list
Thank you for your help with the d-p-q-r-tests on Irix.
After patching d-p-q-r-tests.R, and d-p-q-r-tests.Rout.save file to
reflect the
change, d-p-q-r tests succeed but make check still fails:
> comparing 'complex.Rout' to './complex.Rout.save' ...188c188
> < [1] 0+0i
> ---
> > [1
Thanks a lot Kamil,
for the confirmation:
> "kM" == kamil Marcinkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Thu, 8 Nov 2007 09:41:05 -0700 writes:
kM> Hello list
kM> Here are the results of the tests on R 2.6.0 patched:
>> R version 2.6.0 Patched (2007-11-05 r43362)
>> Copyright
Hello list
Here are the results of the tests on R 2.6.0 patched:
> R version 2.6.0 Patched (2007-11-05 r43362)
> Copyright (C) 2007 The R Foundation for Statistical Computing
> ISBN 3-900051-07-0
...
> > str(.Machine, digits=7)
> List of 18
> $ double.eps : num 2.220446e-16
> $ dou
> "kM" == kamil Marcinkowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Tue, 6 Nov 2007 17:02:56 -0700 writes:
kM> Hello Prof Brian Ripley and list
kM> There is no "d-p-q-r-tests.Rout" file, the following files do exists
kM> and are being sent as attachments:
kM> ./tests/d-p-q-r-tests.
Hello Prof Brian Ripley and list
There is no "d-p-q-r-tests.Rout" file, the following files do exists
and are being sent as attachments:
./tests/d-p-q-r-tests.R , ./tests/d-p-q-r-tests.Rout.save , ./tests/d-
p-q-r-tests.Rout.fail .
Cheers,
Kamil
Kamil Marcinkowski W
We need to see the d-p-q-r-tests.Rout file, and perhaps ask for some more
runs (unfortunately that line number is after massaging). Can you make it
available to us? Or at least a portion containing the quoted line (which
should only occur once)?
On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, kamil Marcinkowski wrote:
Hello
I am trying to install R 2.6.0 on a SGI Origin 350 running IRIX 6.5
6.5.28f
R was configured with the following options:
> --x-includes=/usr/include/X11
> --x-libraries=/usr/lib/X11
> --includedir=/usr/freeware/include
> --includedir=/usr/freeware/lib32
> --includedir=/usr/freeware/lib64
11 matches
Mail list logo
