Re: [Rd] R Bugs link broken

2008-01-11 Thread Martin Maechler
GaGr == Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:54:15 -0500 writes: GaGr The link to R Bugs in the posting guide GaGr http://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html GaGr is broken. What's your definition of broken? GaGr

Re: [Rd] R Bugs link broken

2008-01-11 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Martin Maechler wrote: GaGr == Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Wed, 9 Jan 2008 11:54:15 -0500 writes: GaGr The link to R Bugs in the posting guide GaGr http://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html GaGr is broken. What's your definition of broken?

Re: [Rd] R Bugs link broken

2008-01-11 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
With the dash it goes to section 9.1 entitled R Bugs but with the %20 it goes to the top. It should go to 9.1; however, it looks likes someone fixed it since I posted. On Jan 9, 2008 11:54 AM, Gabor Grothendieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The link to R Bugs in the posting guide

[Rd] R Bugs link broken

2008-01-09 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
The link to R Bugs in the posting guide http://www.r-project.org/posting-guide.html is broken. The - that should be in the link: http://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html#R-Bugs is currently %20: http://cran.r-project.org/doc/FAQ/R-FAQ.html#R%20Bugs