Re: [Rd] R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch

2015-10-29 Thread Rainer M Krug
Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote: > | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I > | didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One > | consequence is (at least on Mac OS X 10.11 but

Re: [Rd] R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch

2015-10-29 Thread Rainer M Krug
Deepayan Sarkar writes: > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote: >> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: >> >>> On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote: >>> | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD

Re: [Rd] R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch

2015-10-29 Thread Deepayan Sarkar
On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 2:09 PM, Rainer M Krug wrote: > Dirk Eddelbuettel writes: > >> On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote: >> | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I >> | didn't get an error so didn't think about the

Re: [Rd] R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch

2015-10-29 Thread peter dalgaard
On 29 Oct 2015, at 10:44 , Rainer M Krug wrote: > Out of interest: What is the magic ~R CMD~ is doing? Is it documented > anywhere? R is open source (and shell scripts are considered self-documenting by some) On Unix-alikes, R is a shell script which, if called with 1st

Re: [Rd] R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch

2015-10-29 Thread Rainer M Krug
peter dalgaard writes: > On 29 Oct 2015, at 10:44 , Rainer M Krug wrote: > >> Out of interest: What is the magic ~R CMD~ is doing? Is it documented >> anywhere? > > > R is open source (and shell scripts are considered self-documenting by > some) True -

[Rd] R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch

2015-10-28 Thread Marius Hofert
Hi, Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One consequence is (at least on Mac OS X 10.11 but probably in more generality) that R_BATCH_OPTIONS are ignored, which was kind of fatal in my case... I am thus

Re: [Rd] R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch

2015-10-28 Thread Marius Hofert
Great, thanks, Dirk. Nice example :-) On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:05 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote: > | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I > | didn't get an error so didn't think about the

Re: [Rd] R CMD BATCH vs R CMD batch

2015-10-28 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 28 October 2015 at 21:39, Marius Hofert wrote: | Out of laziness I just used "R CMD batch" instead of "R CMD BATCH". I | didn't get an error so didn't think about the consequences... One | consequence is (at least on Mac OS X 10.11 but probably in more | generality) that R_BATCH_OPTIONS are