Ah, the woes of English word order -- even this native English speaker
frequently gets messed up!
(but maybe I'm just a bear of little brain).
Best,
Bert
Bert Gunter
Genentech Nonclinical Biostatistics
(650) 467-7374
Data is not information. Information is not knowledge. And knowledge
is
On 09 May 2015, at 22:33 , Henrik Bengtsson henrik.bengts...@ucsf.edu wrote:
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:55 AM, peter dalgaard pda...@gmail.com wrote:
Rephrasing would seem to be in order
Ah... definitely a parse error (I read it as a new paragraph). I
second rephrasing this; your
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 12:55 AM, peter dalgaard pda...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09 May 2015, at 02:53 , Henrik Bengtsson henrik.bengts...@ucsf.edu
wrote:
Hi,
I spotted what looks like another(*) mistake in 'R Language
Definition' on how subsetting should work. In Section 'Indexing
matrices
On 09 May 2015, at 02:53 , Henrik Bengtsson henrik.bengts...@ucsf.edu wrote:
Hi,
I spotted what looks like another(*) mistake in 'R Language
Definition' on how subsetting should work. In Section 'Indexing
matrices and arrays'
Hi,
I spotted what looks like another(*) mistake in 'R Language
Definition' on how subsetting should work. In Section 'Indexing
matrices and arrays'
[http://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/R-lang.html#Indexing-matrices-and-arrays]
one can read
Negative indices are not allowed in
