The 'stringi' package claims robust cross-platform performance. It exports
much functionality of the ICU library and will attempt to install it when
not present.
The function 'stri_sort' accepts a collation argument that can be defined
with 'stri_opts_collator'.
On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 5:15
On 23 Nov 2014, at 01:05 , Henrik Bengtsson h...@biostat.ucsf.edu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Duncan Murdoch
murdoch.dun...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/11/2014, 2:59 PM, Stuart Ambler wrote:
A colleague¹s R program behaved differently when I ran it, and we thought
we traced it
On 23/11/2014 09:39, peter dalgaard wrote:
On 23 Nov 2014, at 01:05 , Henrik Bengtsson h...@biostat.ucsf.edu wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Duncan Murdoch
murdoch.dun...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/11/2014, 2:59 PM, Stuart Ambler wrote:
A colleague¹s R program behaved differently when
For many scientific applications one is really dealing with ASCII characters and
LC_COLLATE=C, even if the user is running in non-C locales. What robust
approaches (if any?) are available to write code that sorts in a
locale-independent way? The Note in ?Sys.setlocale is not overly optimistic
A colleague¹s R program behaved differently when I ran it, and we thought
we traced it probably to different results from string comparisons as
below, with different R versions. However the platforms also differed. A
friend ran it on a few machines and found that the comparison behavior
didn¹t
On 22/11/2014, 2:59 PM, Stuart Ambler wrote:
A colleague¹s R program behaved differently when I ran it, and we thought
we traced it probably to different results from string comparisons as
below, with different R versions. However the platforms also differed. A
friend ran it on a few
You mean where it says that some platforms may not respect the locale (I
assume, though don’t know, that en_US.UTF-8 and en_US.utf8 would be the
same)? But I gather that the general problem has been looked into and is
difficult to solve; thanks.
On 11/22/14, 12:42 PM, Duncan Murdoch
On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Duncan Murdoch
murdoch.dun...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22/11/2014, 2:59 PM, Stuart Ambler wrote:
A colleague¹s R program behaved differently when I ran it, and we thought
we traced it probably to different results from string comparisons as
below, with different R
