Re: [Rd] S4 : declaration of inheritance

Sorry, I make a mistake... I meant : what the difference between setClass("myClass", representation("fatherClass",x="numeric") or setClass("myClass", representation(x="numeric"), contains="fatherClass" > setClass("myClass", >representation(x="numeric"), >conta

Re: [Rd] S4 : declaration of inheritance

setClass("myClass", representation(x="numeric"), contains="fartherClass") seems more logical to me in sense of syntax (pay attention to setClass instead of setMethod and contains instead of containt), but both work apparently. Oleg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi the list, > > There is tw

[Rd] S4 : declaration of inheritance

Hi the list, There is two way to declare a new object with inheritence : one can do setMethod("myClass", representation("fatherClass",x="numeric") or setMethod("myClass", representation(x="numeric"), containt="fatherClass" Is there any difference ? What is the usal way ? C