Re: [Rd] Strict-prototypes definitions in R includes

2008-01-28 Thread Laurent Gautier
Thanks the answer. Would submitted patches with strict post-KR prototypes definition, for the void cases and for the includes likely to be used by writers of R extensions, be accepted ? Laurent 2008/1/27, Prof Brian Ripley [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think the answer is 'it depends'. - such

Re: [Rd] Strict-prototypes definitions in R includes

2008-01-28 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008, Laurent Gautier wrote: Thanks the answer. Would submitted patches with strict post-KR prototypes definition, for the void cases and for the includes likely to be used by writers of R extensions, be accepted ? Yes, against R-devel. But some you won't be able to do (e.g.

[Rd] Strict-prototypes definitions in R includes

2008-01-27 Thread Laurent Gautier
Dear list, Whenever the flag -Wstrict-prototypes is set in gcc, compiling code that includes headers in lib/R/include generates often warnings (example with R-2.6.1: Rinternals.h:560: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype ). All such warnings I looked at were about functions with