Re: [Rd] Suggestion: Allow packages to add additional information to sessionInfo()

2009-09-04 Thread Martin Morgan
Friedrich Leisch wrote: >> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:10:31 -0700, >> Henrik Bengtsson (HB) wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Kevin R. > > Coombes wrote: > >> [1] I agree that sessionInfo() can be taken further. > >> [2] I even more strongly agree that it would be a bad idea

Re: [Rd] Suggestion: Allow packages to add additional information to sessionInfo()

2009-09-04 Thread Friedrich Leisch
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2009 11:10:31 -0700, > Henrik Bengtsson (HB) wrote: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Kevin R. > Coombes wrote: >> [1] I agree that sessionInfo() can be taken further. >> [2] I even more strongly agree that it would be a bad idea to allow packages >> to add feat

Re: [Rd] Suggestion: Allow packages to add additional information to sessionInfo()

2009-09-03 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Kevin R. Coombes wrote: > [1] I agree that sessionInfo() can be taken further. > [2] I even more strongly agree that it would be a bad idea to allow packages > to add features that cause the base sessionInfo() function to fail. > > Why not add an extra function call

Re: [Rd] Suggestion: Allow packages to add additional information to sessionInfo()

2009-09-03 Thread Kevin R. Coombes
[1] I agree that sessionInfo() can be taken further. [2] I even more strongly agree that it would be a bad idea to allow packages to add features that cause the base sessionInfo() function to fail. Why not add an extra function called something like "packageSessionInfo()" that would provide th

Re: [Rd] Suggestion: Allow packages to add additional information to sessionInfo()

2009-09-03 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Gabor Grothendieck wrote: > The danger is that it could introduce bugs into the process > of reporting bugs. If you mean that sessionInfo() will result in an error, that is easily solved by a tryCatch() statement. Timeouts are harder. One can also consider provid

Re: [Rd] Suggestion: Allow packages to add additional information to sessionInfo()

2009-09-03 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
The danger is that it could introduce bugs into the process of reporting bugs. On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > Hi, > > sessionInfo() has been proven really useful, but you still often have > to ask for additional information in order to help troubleshooting. > For instanc

[Rd] Suggestion: Allow packages to add additional information to sessionInfo()

2009-09-03 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
Hi, sessionInfo() has been proven really useful, but you still often have to ask for additional information in order to help troubleshooting. For instance, for troubleshooting the aroma.affymetrix, it is very helpful to know what the current working directory is, for other packages certain system