On Apr 10, 2011, at 19:54 , wrote:
> On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Hadley Wickham wrote:
>
Okay, I understand what you are trying to do. Yes, you have fooled
codetools in this instance.
>>>
>>> ...but notice that the codetools warning is just that: It _is_ acknowledged
>>> that these thing
On Sun, 10 Apr 2011, Hadley Wickham wrote:
Okay, I understand what you are trying to do. Yes, you have fooled codetools
in this instance.
...but notice that the codetools warning is just that: It _is_ acknowledged
that these things occasionally happen by design. There are a couple of cases
>> Okay, I understand what you are trying to do. Yes, you have fooled
>> codetools in this instance.
>
> ...but notice that the codetools warning is just that: It _is_ acknowledged
> that these things occasionally happen by design. There are a couple of cases
> in base R too:
>
> * checking R c
On Apr 10, 2011, at 15:10 , Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> On 11-04-09 9:22 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:
>> On 4/9/2011 6:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
>>> On 11-04-09 7:02 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:
"R CMD check" will give this message sometimes when I don't feel
it's appropriat
On 4/10/2011 6:10 AM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 11-04-09 9:22 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 4/9/2011 6:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 11-04-09 7:02 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 4/9/2011 2:31 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Johnson
wrote:
Years ago, I did lots of
On 11-04-09 9:22 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 4/9/2011 6:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 11-04-09 7:02 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 4/9/2011 2:31 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Johnson
wrote:
Years ago, I did lots of Perl programming. Perl will let you be lazy
On 4/9/2011 6:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 11-04-09 7:02 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 4/9/2011 2:31 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Johnson
wrote:
Years ago, I did lots of Perl programming. Perl will let you be lazy
and write functions that refer to undefined
On 4/9/2011 6:12 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 11-04-09 7:02 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 4/9/2011 2:31 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Johnson
wrote:
Years ago, I did lots of Perl programming. Perl will let you be lazy
and write functions that refer to undefine
On 11-04-09 7:02 PM, Spencer Graves wrote:
On 4/9/2011 2:31 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Years ago, I did lots of Perl programming. Perl will let you be lazy
and write functions that refer to undefined variables (like R does),
but there is also
On 4/9/2011 2:31 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Years ago, I did lots of Perl programming. Perl will let you be lazy
and write functions that refer to undefined variables (like R does),
but there is also a strict mode so the interpreter will block
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> Years ago, I did lots of Perl programming. Perl will let you be lazy
> and write functions that refer to undefined variables (like R does),
> but there is also a strict mode so the interpreter will block anything
> when a variable is mentioned
On 11-04-09 3:51 PM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Years ago, I did lots of Perl programming. Perl will let you be lazy
and write functions that refer to undefined variables (like R does),
but there is also a strict mode so the interpreter will block anything
when a variable is mentioned that has not been
Years ago, I did lots of Perl programming. Perl will let you be lazy
and write functions that refer to undefined variables (like R does),
but there is also a strict mode so the interpreter will block anything
when a variable is mentioned that has not been defined. I wish there
were a strict mode fo
13 matches
Mail list logo
