Re: [Rd] Wrong length of POSIXt vectors (PR#10507)

2007-12-16 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 15/12/2007 5:17 PM, Martin Maechler wrote: TP == Tony Plate [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:58:30 -0700 writes: TP Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12/13/2007 1:59 PM, Tony Plate wrote: Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12/11/2007 6:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Re: [Rd] Wrong length of POSIXt vectors (PR#10507)

2007-12-16 Thread Tony Plate
Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 15/12/2007 5:17 PM, Martin Maechler wrote: TP == Tony Plate [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:58:30 -0700 writes: TP Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12/13/2007 1:59 PM, Tony Plate wrote: Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12/11/2007 6:20 AM, [EMAIL

Re: [Rd] Wrong length of POSIXt vectors (PR#10507)

2007-12-15 Thread Martin Maechler
TP == Tony Plate [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, 14 Dec 2007 13:58:30 -0700 writes: TP Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12/13/2007 1:59 PM, Tony Plate wrote: Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12/11/2007 6:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Petr Simecek Version: 2.5.1, 2.6.1

Re: [Rd] Wrong length of POSIXt vectors (PR#10507)

2007-12-15 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
If it were simply deprecated and then changed then everyone using it would get a warning during the period of deprecation so it would not be so bad. Given that its current behavior is not very useful I suspect its not widely used anyways. | haven't followed the whole discussion so sorry if these

Re: [Rd] Wrong length of POSIXt vectors (PR#10507)

2007-12-14 Thread Tony Plate
Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12/13/2007 1:59 PM, Tony Plate wrote: Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12/11/2007 6:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Petr Simecek Version: 2.5.1, 2.6.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (195.113.231.2) Several times I have experienced that a length of a

Re: [Rd] Wrong length of POSIXt vectors (PR#10507)

2007-12-13 Thread Tony Plate
Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12/11/2007 6:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Petr Simecek Version: 2.5.1, 2.6.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (195.113.231.2) Several times I have experienced that a length of a POSIXt vector has not been computed right. Example:

Re: [Rd] Wrong length of POSIXt vectors (PR#10507)

2007-12-13 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 12/13/2007 1:59 PM, Tony Plate wrote: Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 12/11/2007 6:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Petr Simecek Version: 2.5.1, 2.6.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (195.113.231.2) Several times I have experienced that a length of a POSIXt vector has not

[Rd] Wrong length of POSIXt vectors (PR#10507)

2007-12-12 Thread simecek
Full_Name: Petr Simecek Version: 2.5.1, 2.6.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (195.113.231.2) Several times I have experienced that a length of a POSIXt vector has not been computed right. Example: tv-structure(list(sec = c(50, 0, 55, 12, 2, 0, 37, NA, 17, 3, 31 ), min = c(1L, 10L, 11L,

Re: [Rd] Wrong length of POSIXt vectors (PR#10507)

2007-12-12 Thread Peter Dalgaard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Petr Simecek Version: 2.5.1, 2.6.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (195.113.231.2) Several times I have experienced that a length of a POSIXt vector has not been computed right. Example: tv-structure(list(sec = c(50, 0, 55, 12, 2, 0, 37, NA,

Re: [Rd] Wrong length of POSIXt vectors (PR#10507)

2007-12-12 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 12/11/2007 6:20 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Petr Simecek Version: 2.5.1, 2.6.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (195.113.231.2) Several times I have experienced that a length of a POSIXt vector has not been computed right. Example: tv-structure(list(sec = c(50,

Re: [Rd] Wrong length of POSIXt vectors (PR#10507)

2007-12-12 Thread ripley
It is right: it is a list of length 9. You even constructed it as such a list! On Tue, 11 Dec 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Full_Name: Petr Simecek Version: 2.5.1, 2.6.1 OS: Windows XP Submission from: (NULL) (195.113.231.2) Several times I have experienced that a length of a POSIXt