-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: mark.braving...@csiro.au [mailto:mark.braving...@csiro.au]
Gesendet: Freitag, 17. September 2010 01:36
An: kasperdanielhan...@gmail.com; kevin.r.coom...@gmail.com
Cc: janko.thy...@ku-eichstaett.de; r-devel@r-project.org
Betreff: RE: [Rd] a small
From: Uwe Ligges ligges_at_statistik.tu-dortmund.de
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:23:01 +0200
On 29.08.2010 22:34, Kyle Matoba wrote:
All,
I just finished the process of build a package for the first time and
found
it characteristically (for R) very straightforward and well
documented.
On 16.09.2010 20:18, Janko Thyson wrote:
From: Uwe Liggesligges_at_statistik.tu-dortmund.de
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:23:01 +0200
On 29.08.2010 22:34, Kyle Matoba wrote:
All,
I just finished the process of build a package for the first time and
found
it characteristically (for R) very
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
[mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Janko Thyson
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:19 AM
To: r-de...@r-project. org
Subject: Re: [Rd] a small suggestion for improving the
building of packages
...
Dear Uwe,
in principle, I totally
On 16/09/2010 2:43 PM, Uwe Ligges wrote:
On 16.09.2010 20:18, Janko Thyson wrote:
From: Uwe Liggesligges_at_statistik.tu-dortmund.de
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:23:01 +0200
On 29.08.2010 22:34, Kyle Matoba wrote:
All,
I just finished the process of build a package for the first time
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: William Dunlap [mailto:wdun...@tibco.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. September 2010 20:45
An: Janko Thyson; r-de...@r-project. org
Betreff: RE: [Rd] a small suggestion for improving the building of
packages
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murdoch.dun...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. September 2010 20:55
An: Uwe Ligges
Cc: Janko Thyson; r-de...@r-project. org
Betreff: Re: [Rd] a small suggestion for improving the building of
packages
On 16/09/2010 2:43
On 16/09/2010 2:45 PM, William Dunlap wrote:
From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
[mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Janko Thyson
Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2010 11:19 AM
To: r-de...@r-project. org
Subject: Re: [Rd] a small suggestion for improving the
building of
The phrase that caught my attention in your post is the one about
running package.skeleton() over and over. When I'm developing
packages, I never run it more than once. And I usually delete a lot of
the files it produces (since I like to organize my functions in logical
batches and not in
I agree with Kevin, I never run package.skeleton more than once. But
one advantage to running it over and over again is if you change the
names or the ordering of function arguments. That gets autowritten
and I could see that being convenient if you change those a lot (as
you sometime do in
FWIW, the package-building tools in the 'mvbutils' package-- see
?mvbutils.packaging.tools-- are supposed to alleviate much of this (provided of
course you are willing to sign up to MY view of the universe...). Building a
legal package out of existing code from scratch takes me less than 5
On 29.08.2010 22:34, Kyle Matoba wrote:
All,
I just finished the process of build a package for the first time and found
it characteristically (for R) very straightforward and well documented.
Whenever I deal with open source software I always endeavor to finish the
task I have in mind, and
From: Uwe Ligges
On 29.08.2010 22:34, Kyle Matoba wrote:
All,
I just finished the process of build a package for the
first time and found
it characteristically (for R) very straightforward and well
documented.
Whenever I deal with open source software I always endeavor
to
On Sep 15, 2010, at 17:01 , Liaw, Andy wrote:
Or else it may be possible to have some malicious person write a script
that
automagically generate some large number of bogus packages and submit
them to CRAN...
Andy
Douglas Adams -
- There is a theory which states that if ever
Uwe,
Yes, this makes good sense. All I am saying is that it is somewhat out of
the open-source, the user is smart and we should not _artificially force_
him or her to jump through some hoop. I do not contend that packages
destined for CRAN should have anything but the fullest documentation
On Sep 15, 2010, at 10:14 AM, peter dalgaard wrote:
On Sep 15, 2010, at 17:01 , Liaw, Andy wrote:
Or else it may be possible to have some malicious person write a script
that
automagically generate some large number of bogus packages and submit
them to CRAN...
Andy
Douglas
Yes, well, anyone clever enough to do this will not be stopped by
automatically manipulating some text to fill in the minimal documentation
necessary to pass checks.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 8:01 AM, Liaw, Andy andy_l...@merck.com wrote:
From: Uwe Ligges
On 29.08.2010 22:34, Kyle Matoba
17 matches
Mail list logo
