Re: [Rd] norm_rand() in R-extension vs rnorm in R ---which is better?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Kyeongmi Cheon > Sent: Saturday, March 29, 2008 9:09 PM > To: r-devel@r-project.org > Subject: [Rd] norm_rand() in R-extension vs rnorm in R ---which is better? > > I need to

[Rd] norm_rand() in R-extension vs rnorm in R ---which is better?

I need to generate good quality of random numbers from univariate normal distribution for further transformation. I tried rnorm in R but it was not good sometimes. Someone said C++ standard library or Fortran's built-in functions for that are good. I found that there is double norm_rand() in R-exte