Uwe Ligges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Currently, the main problems with many packages are missing *recent*
> binaries (after the latest S4 changes) of BioC packages, hence many
> dependencies may not be working. I do not want to compile the whole BioC
> repository as well.
The Bioconductor b
> "MM" == Martin Maechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Tue, 12 Sep 2006 08:56:41 +0200 writes:
> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:25:58 +0100 (BST) writes:
BDR> At least some of this will go away if you use a current
BDR
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> At least some of this will go away if you use a current version of 2.4.0
> alpha rather than one that is a week old (as the posting guide does ask).
> We are now at r39258, and some of those binary packages were built against
> a substantially later version of 2.4.0
> "BDR" == Prof Brian Ripley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> on Mon, 11 Sep 2006 22:25:58 +0100 (BST) writes:
BDR> At least some of this will go away if you use a current
BDR> version of 2.4.0 alpha rather than one that is a week
BDR> old (as the posting guide does ask). We are now
At least some of this will go away if you use a current version of 2.4.0
alpha rather than one that is a week old (as the posting guide does ask).
We are now at r39258, and some of those binary packages were built against
a substantially later version of 2.4.0 alpha.
If you look at the list of
I just downloaded the windows version
R version 2.4.0 alpha (2006-09-05 r39134)
1. When I downloaded the packages, the following two were not found.
> utils:::menuInstallPkgs()
--- Please select a CRAN mirror for use in this session ---
dependency ''fCalendar'' is not available
dependency ''Spa
