Re: [Rd] suggestion for sets tools upgrade

2014-02-08 Thread Carl Witthoft
Thanks to Duncan and all who responded. I agree that the algebraic set rules do not allow for indistinguishable elements; I must have been deeply immersed in quantum fermions when I wrote strictly rather than less in front of algebraic style. I'll clean up my code (so that intersect()

Re: [Rd] suggestion for sets tools upgrade

2014-02-07 Thread Kevin Coombes
As a mathematician by training (and a former practicing mathematician, both of which qualifications I rarely feel compelled to pull out of the closet), I have to agree with Michael's challenge to the original assertion about the mathematical concept of sets. Sets are collections of distinct

Re: [Rd] suggestion for sets tools upgrade

2014-02-07 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 14-02-06 8:31 PM, Carl Witthoft wrote: First, let me apologize in advance if this is the wrong place to submit a suggestion for a change to functions in the base-R package. It never really occurred to me that I'd have an idea worthy of such a change. My idea is to provide an upgrade to all

[Rd] suggestion for sets tools upgrade

2014-02-06 Thread Carl Witthoft
First, let me apologize in advance if this is the wrong place to submit a suggestion for a change to functions in the base-R package. It never really occurred to me that I'd have an idea worthy of such a change. My idea is to provide an upgrade to all the sets tools (intersect, union,