Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
>>>
>>> On 6 April 2008 at 08:37, Spencer Graves wrote:
>>> |
>>> [...]
>>> | However, the comment from Hans Borchers (below) raises
On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 12:59 PM, Kurt Hornik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
>
> > On 6 April 2008 at 08:37, Spencer Graves wrote:
> > |
> > [...]
> > | However, the comment from Hans Borchers (below) raises a related
> > | question: What might be the best way t
> Dirk Eddelbuettel writes:
> On 6 April 2008 at 08:37, Spencer Graves wrote:
> |
> [...]
> | However, the comment from Hans Borchers (below) raises a related
> | question: What might be the best way to build a collaboration with
> | existing optimization initiatives, possibly makin
On 6 April 2008 at 08:37, Spencer Graves wrote:
|
[...]
| However, the comment from Hans Borchers (below) raises a related
| question: What might be the best way to build a collaboration with
| existing optimization initiatives, possibly making R a platform of
| choice for making it ea
What would people suggest someone do to improve the optimization
capabilities in R? A few ideas are mentioned below. I just got 578
hits from RSiteSearch("optimization", "fun"), and I wonder if there's a
better way to get a reasonable overview of what's currently available in
R -- an
