On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:45 AM, Sean O'Riordain sean...@acm.org wrote:
Good morning Dominick,
I don't use the Rcpp package and have only the vaguest notions of its
history.
One of your requests is that your name might be removed from the project as
you no longer wish to be associated with
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Gavin Simpson gavin.simp...@ucl.ac.ukwrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:24 -0500, Dominick Samperi wrote:
snip /
Just to be clear I have never used the package and am not truly
commenting on this particular case but only the general ideas in this
thread.
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Martyn Plummer plumm...@iarc.fr wrote:
Dear Dominick,
The R community does not have a conflict resolution mechanism. We are
quite used to disputes that end with one party, usually a recognized
authority, saying No, you are objectively, verifiably wrong. We
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:21 AM, Spencer Graves
spencer.gra...@structuremonitoring.com wrote:
On 12/2/2010 6:20 AM, Martyn Plummer wrote:
Dear Dominick,
The R community does not have a conflict resolution mechanism. We are
quite used to disputes that end with one party, usually a
Yes, I agree, Spencer. The worst thing that can happen is for your
ideas/creations to go completely unnoticed.
Here is what David Hume had to say about how his first philosophical work
(Treatise of Human Nature) was received:
Never literary attempt was more unfortunate than my Treatise of Human
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Dominick Samperi djsamp...@gmail.com wrote:
Worst yet is having to compete with your own work.
About which competition are we talking then? I'm sorry, but the vast
majority of the 7 lines of code of the rcpp are not your work. And
honestly, I don't know of
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 10:47 AM, Joris Meys jorism...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Dominick Samperi djsamp...@gmail.com
wrote:
Worst yet is having to compete with your own work.
About which competition are we talking then? I'm sorry, but the vast
majority of the
Dominick Samperi djsamp...@gmail.com
on Thu, 2 Dec 2010 03:27:58 -0500 writes:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Gavin Simpson
gavin.simp...@ucl.ac.ukwrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-01 at 20:24 -0500, Dominick Samperi wrote:
snip /
Just to be clear I have never used the package
On Dec 2, 2010, at 15:20 , Martyn Plummer wrote:
Everybody knows that you have an acrimonious relationship with the
current developers of Rcpp (and if they don't then a cursory look at the
rcpp-devel archives will confirm this). The issue of the acknowledgment
that you are complaining about
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 12:29 PM, Gabor Grothendieck ggrothendi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Claudia Beleites cbelei...@units.it
wrote:
On 12/02/2010 10:32 AM, Liviu Andronic wrote:
Dear all
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 7:21 PM, Dominick Samperidjsamp...@gmail.com
Prof. Ripley,
I've just done the installation of the R package 'Matrix' to my 64-bit R
2.12.0, and it is loaded fine. Seems adding -m64 to the CXX line solved the
problem.
I had,
CC=cc -xc99 -m64 -xarch=sparcvis2
CXX=CC -library=stlport4
And now I have (the working version),
CC=cc -xc99
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 12:12 -0500, ivo welch wrote:
I just figured out what is happening. The root drive (presumably OSX
virtual memory) becomes depleted. The error message about memory not
mapped was a hint, too. So, not really R's fault. However, I wonder
It still may be R's fault. This
There are repeated claims concerning a Rcpp fork. Let's address both terms
in turn.
i) Rcpp was used in November 2008 as the name for a re-launch of a package
which had seen releases on CRAN in 2005/2006 during which it was also
renamed to RcppTemplate. Hence no package of name Rcpp
Matt,
please use
R -d gdb
and then bt for a more useful trace.
Thanks,
Simon
On Dec 2, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Matt Shotwell wrote:
On Wed, 2010-11-24 at 12:12 -0500, ivo welch wrote:
I just figured out what is happening. The root drive (presumably OSX
virtual memory) becomes depleted. The
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 4:35 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote:
There are repeated claims concerning a Rcpp fork. Let's address both
terms
in turn.
i) Rcpp was used in November 2008 as the name for a re-launch of a package
which had seen releases on CRAN in 2005/2006 during
On 2 December 2010 at 17:23, Dominick Samperi wrote:
| OK, since you are so accomodating, then please remove all reference to
| my name from Rcpp as I do not want to be subject to arbitrary revisions of
| my status. I may not have the right to say how my prior work will be used,
| but I think I
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote:
On 2 December 2010 at 17:23, Dominick Samperi wrote:
| OK, since you are so accomodating, then please remove all reference to
| my name from Rcpp as I do not want to be subject to arbitrary revisions
of
| my status. I
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel e...@debian.org wrote:
On 2 December 2010 at 17:23, Dominick Samperi wrote:
| OK, since you are so accomodating, then please remove all reference to
| my name from Rcpp as I do not want to be subject to arbitrary revisions
of
| my status. I
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Dominick Samperi djsamp...@gmail.com wrote:
We? Romain did not arrive on the scene until after November of 2009.
To live outside the law you must be honest --- Bob Dylan.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
Peter Dalgaard and Martin Maechler were
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Joris Meys jorism...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:38 AM, Dominick Samperi djsamp...@gmail.com
wrote:
We? Romain did not arrive on the scene until after November of 2009.
To live outside the law you must be honest --- Bob Dylan.
20 matches
Mail list logo
