Dear list,
On a follow up from my previous email, I am now trying to allocate vectors
of length larger than 32-bit in C.
From the R internals documentation, I read that:
The sxpinfo header is defined as a 32-bit C structure...
and
A SEXPREC is a C structure containing the 32-bit header...
The
On 16/05/2014, 4:16 AM, Adrian Dușa wrote:
Dear list,
On a follow up from my previous email, I am now trying to allocate vectors
of length larger than 32-bit in C.
From the R internals documentation, I read that:
The sxpinfo header is defined as a 32-bit C structure...
and
A SEXPREC is a C
On 16/05/2014 11:06, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 16/05/2014, 4:16 AM, Adrian Dușa wrote:
Dear list,
On a follow up from my previous email, I am now trying to allocate
vectors
of length larger than 32-bit in C.
From the R internals documentation, I read that:
The sxpinfo header is defined as a
Cc'ing Kurt since the version control history shows he brought it in a
few years ago: https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/53d4b432f7
The fix can be fairly simple if someone has one minute:
lc_ctype - Sys.getlocale(LC_CTYPE)
on.exit(Sys.setlocale(LC_CTYPE, lc_ctype), add = TRUE)
Consider the following:
20:28[1] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20:29 [1] 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
It seems that when a vector has 10 elements, it prints out differently than
one with 9 (extra space before the opening bracket). I can't see why this
is happening. I am writing a manual
It seems that when a vector has 10 elements, it prints out differently than
one with 9 (extra space before the opening bracket). I can't see why this
is happening.
It is happening because the print routine wants to be ready to print
all the line-beginning [index] tags aligned with each other.
Dominic,
Actually it makes perfect sense. When R prints vectors of length less
than 9, it does not ever need to print 2 digits for the index. For lengths
between 10 and 99, it may need to print an index with 2 digits, therefore,
it prints the first index and all single digit indexes with a
Thanks David and Bill for your answers. It does makes sense. So if I want
to make things neater visually, I have no other option than to post-process
the output I guess?
Thx,
Dominic
2014-05-16 16:58 GMT-04:00 William Dunlap wdun...@tibco.com:
It seems that when a vector has 10 elements, it
Would it make sense to take low-level utilities like rowQ from Biobase and
move them closer the S4Vectors level?
Michael
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
i think they should probably move, but i wonder if S4Vectors is the right
destination.
is the row concept vector-like? i was looking for rowQ recently and
expected it to be in genefilter...
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Michael Lawrence
lawrence.mich...@gene.com wrote:
Would it make
I want to remind you of matrixStats by Henrik Bengstson which basically
have all of the
rowXX
colXX
for many choices of XX. This unifies a number of utils which are now
spread across multiple packages.
It would be great to have all of the matrixStats functions (there are not
that many)
11 matches
Mail list logo
