[Rd] Checking package vignettes: WARNING

Hi, I want to have a vignette in one of my R packages. Hence, I added an Sweave file into the /inst/doc subdirectory of this package. Unfortunately, 'R CMD check' gives a warning: == [...] * checking tests ... OK * checking package vignettes in

[Rd] Problems with snowfall

Guys, Is anyone using snowfall? It seems that the last version is broken. sfinit contains test code: data(config, package = snowfall) configM - as.matrix(t(config)) config - as.list(configM) names(config) - dimnames(configM)[[2]] .sfOption$SERVER -

Re: [Rd] Checking package vignettes: WARNING

Hello Arne, I do not know if this matters, but have you used 'results = verbatim' in your R code chunk? See page 13 in: http://www.statistik.lmu.de/~leisch/Sweave/Sweave-manual.pdf Best, Bernhard Hi, I want to have a vignette in one of my R packages. Hence, I added an Sweave file into the

Re: [Rd] spss long labels

Hi Kurt, I have committed your patch and your new spss_long.sav example file, tested things and uploaded a new version of 'foreign', namely 0.8-27 to CRAN. I vaguely remember that other useRs have asked for long-label support in the past, so if you are (or know of) such a user, we'd be glad if

Re: [Rd] Checking package vignettes: WARNING

Hi Bernhard! On Wednesday 16 July 2008 14:16:05, you wrote: I do not know if this matters, but have you used 'results = verbatim' in your R code chunk? See page 13 in: http://www.statistik.lmu.de/~leisch/Sweave/Sweave-manual.pdf Thank you for this hint. I have tried this option, but it seems

Re: [Rd] Embedded R, last errormessage, and stack smashing

The only way to overcome the problem I can find is to tweak the R_CStackLimit with: R_CStackLimit = (uintptr_t) -1; The question I am having now is: what are the implications of doing so, that is what are the potential problems ? The R-extensions manual says: Stack-checking can be disabled by

Re: [Rd] Embedded R, last errormessage, and stack smashing

Laurent, On Jul 16, 2008, at 9:02 AM, Laurent Gautier wrote: The only way to overcome the problem I can find is to tweak the R_CStackLimit with: R_CStackLimit = (uintptr_t) -1; The question I am having now is: what are the implications of doing so, that is what are the potential problems ?

[Rd] Snow or alternative MPI packages on Windows

Guys, I'm running R on both Windows Linux. I'm looking at a number of packages for parallel execution. It seems that the most used packages are snow and Rmpi. snow seems more user friendly, but it doesn't run on windows. I see from searching the mailing list that I'm not the first one to try

Re: [Rd] Snow or alternative MPI packages on Windows

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guys, I'm running R on both Windows Linux. I'm looking at a number of packages for parallel execution. It seems that the most used packages are snow and Rmpi. snow seems more user friendly, but it doesn't run on windows. I see from searching the mailing list

Re: [Rd] Snow or alternative MPI packages on Windows

Hello, we are using Rmpi and snow on windows. It is working very well. We are using Windows Server 2003 and *MPICH2. I probably will manage to have some tests with the new snow (*snow_0.3-3)* version this week. Best Markus Martin Morgan schrieb: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Guys, I'm

Re: [Rd] Embedded R, last errormessage, and stack smashing

Laurent Gautier wrote on 07/16/2008 08:02 AM: The only way to overcome the problem I can find is to tweak the R_CStackLimit with: R_CStackLimit = (uintptr_t) -1; The question I am having now is: what are the implications of doing so, that is what are the potential problems ? The problem is a

Re: [Rd] Snow or alternative MPI packages on Windows

Markus, That's interesting. I'm using snow_0.3-0 that's the version on CRAN. I see that on the maintainer's website newer versions are available... I just tried snow_0.3-3 and as you said it actually works fine! Thanks a lot for the help, that's exactly what I was looking for! // Giuseppe

Re: [Rd] split.Date

McGehee, Robert writes: Hello, I wanted to suggest that the below method for split.Date be added to the base library to significantly speed up splits with values of class Date. In the below example I show a speed improvement of 175x for 1000 data points. On a vector of size 1e6, the time

Re: [Rd] Checking package vignettes: WARNING

On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:57:39 +0200, Arne Henningsen (AH) wrote: Hi Bernhard! On Wednesday 16 July 2008 14:16:05, you wrote: I do not know if this matters, but have you used 'results = verbatim' in your R code chunk? See page 13 in:

Re: [Rd] Embedded R, last errormessage, and stack smashing

2008/7/16 Jeffrey Horner [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Laurent Gautier wrote on 07/16/2008 08:02 AM: The only way to overcome the problem I can find is to tweak the R_CStackLimit with: R_CStackLimit = (uintptr_t) -1; The question I am having now is: what are the implications of doing so, that is

[Rd] rowSums()/colSums() don't preserve the 'integer' storage mode

Hi, Wouldn't that make sense to have rowSums()/colSums() to preserve the storage mode? m - matrix(1:15, nrow=5) storage.mode(m) [1] integer storage.mode(sum(m)) [1] integer storage.mode(rowSums(m)) [1] double --- surprising! Cheers, H.