Re: [Rd] changed behaviour of 'get' in 2.8.0: request for unchange

2008-10-24 Thread Luke Tierney
Returning the internal R_MissingArg token was a bug. From the svn logs it looks like I fixed this bug back in June (so has been in R-devel for a while) along with fixing a bug in the way system.time used to be defined. I no longer recall the details but suspect the need to fix this arose in

Re: [Rd] changed behaviour of 'get' in 2.8.0: request for unchange

2008-10-24 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Luke Tierney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There is already sone desire to have a way of checking whether a binding contains a delayed evaluation, so maybe something like a function bindingStatus that returns one of active, missing, delayed or evaluated makes sense.

Re: [Rd] Getting the panel location of a xyplot matrix using a mouse click in a GDCanvas

2008-10-24 Thread Daniel Kornhauser
Thanks Deepayan ! It worked great ! You can take a look at my commented sloppy code below. It's mostly copy and paste from clickFocus. If you ever get a chance I suggest you divide clickFocus in in two functions: - trellis.clickFocus: Would behave like the function you have now but would

[Rd] unlist change the ordered type

2008-10-24 Thread Christophe Genolini
Hi the list, unlist respect the all the atomic type except orderd (it change of ordered into factor) : ### integer class(unlist(list(1:5,1:3))) #[1] integer ### numeric class(unlist(list(1.2,3.5))) #[1] numeric ### character class(unlist(list(e,e))) #[1] character ### factor

[Rd] gfortran optimization problems

2008-10-24 Thread Dave Roberts
Colleagues, I have a routine in package labdsv that calls a FORTRAN subroutine. Recently, I was informed that it sometimes gives different results on a PC and Mac, and that the PC version is clearly wrong. I tested it on linux (because I don't have a PC), and I get the same (incorrect)

Re: [Rd] gfortran optimization problems

2008-10-24 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 24/10/2008 6:53 PM, Dave Roberts wrote: Colleagues, I have a routine in package labdsv that calls a FORTRAN subroutine. Recently, I was informed that it sometimes gives different results on a PC and Mac, and that the PC version is clearly wrong. I tested it on linux (because I don't have

Re: [Rd] changed behaviour of 'get' in 2.8.0: request for unchange

2008-10-24 Thread Mark.Bravington
Thanks both The other item that might have a relationship to this is the ability to a copy an object without evaluating it. This can't be done entirely in R but can be done in C code from R: http://tolstoy.newcastle.edu.au/R/e2/devel/07/09/.html For me, copying is even more important

Re: [Rd] unlist change the ordered type

2008-10-24 Thread Charles C. Berry
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Christophe Genolini wrote: Hi the list, unlist respect the all the atomic type except orderd (it change of ordered into factor) : ### integer class(unlist(list(1:5,1:3))) #[1] integer ### numeric class(unlist(list(1.2,3.5))) #[1] numeric ### character