Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Whit Armstrong wrote:
I have a package that takes about 20 minutes to compile which tends to
prolong the compile/test/compile cycle.
Does anyone know how to get R CMD check or R CMD INSTALL to use
parallel make?
I looked at R CMD INSTALL --help, but I don't see
These usually indicate incorrect files. Have you looked at the
experimental Rd parser in R-devel to see if it pinpoints an error?
For example, in both Fperm.Rd and compareDerivatives.Rd there is an
\itemize{} construct inside \value, which is incorrect as \value is itself
an implicit
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Whit Armstrong wrote:
I have a package that takes about 20 minutes to compile which tends to
prolong the compile/test/compile cycle.
Does anyone know how to get R CMD check or R CMD INSTALL to use parallel
make?
I looked at R
Hello R-devel,
I have legal problems and perhaps you can help me.
Long story short: Do have the licence of R the linking exception?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GPL_linking_exception
Is it possible to build a frontend for R under the e.u.l.a. or another
proprietary licence?
Greetings
Wilm
Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Dec 1, 2008, at 6:11 AM, Laurent Gautier wrote:
Stefan Evert wrote:
The steps needed to generate the error are:
- install a binary distribution of R (default location)
- add R to the PATH
Did you actually add
/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resources/bin/
to your
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Whit Armstrong wrote:
I have a package that takes about 20 minutes to compile which tends to
prolong the compile/test/compile cycle.
Does anyone know how to get R CMD check or R CMD INSTALL to use
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Wilm Schumacher wrote:
Hello R-devel,
I have legal problems and perhaps you can help me.
You really do need ask legally qualified people about legal problems, not
least because you have not even stated the jurisdiction that applies.
Long story short: Do have the
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, John Nolan wrote:
I recently upgraded to Rtools28 to build a package under
Windows. I see that g77 is no longer in Rtools, but it
does have gfortran, and it uses version:
GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.2.1-sjlj (mingw32-2)
I am compiling some old fortran code as part of a larger
It is a 'feature' of Windows Vista. Why not just use tryCatch()?
The older version of file.access() used to report access when there was
none, so the error have happened both ways.
(I think any OS with multiple filesystems potentially has problems like
this: we saw them with Unix (Solaris)
You should not have started with R/C API without reading this (first
link in google): Writing R Extensions. For your particular question
you want pages 72+ and sections 5.9.3 and 5.9.4, possibly further as
well
Dr Oleg Sklyar
Research Technologist
AHL / Man Investments Ltd
+44 (0)20 7144 3107
We have a local certificate problem on our servers. As a result,
fetchmail may not be fetching mails to be processed by the bug tracker.
I expect that the problem wil go away by itself fairly soon, but please
don't do anything silly (like sending the same report 15 times).
--
O__
I guess that we this comparing apples with oranges here:
a default R install is leaving binaries in the path when performing
a default install, which does not seem to be the case here
(therefore forcing a hunt for the executable for the R console and
resulting in the present thread).
Dear Prof. Ripley:
Thanks very much. It looks like removing the \itemize from
within \value should fix the problem, though I haven't fully tested it
yet. I previously removed that from Fperm.fd and the problem is fixed
there. I haven't yet tested it with tperm.fd and
Dear developers,
the tick marks and labels produced by axis.POSIXct look strange for time
horizons of a few hours, see the following example:
plot(seq(as.POSIXct(14:00,format=%H:%M),as.POSIXct(18:00,format=%H:%M),length.out=20),1:20)
This (copypaste error?) is easily fixed, see the
Good evening,
Spotted a very minor spelling mistake in the source for the grep help.
And thanks to R-Core for all their work - it's a tribute to R-Core,
that these sort of problems are rare indeed.
Best regards,
Sean O'Riordain
Dublin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/R/RSVN/R/trunk/src/library/base/man$
Hi,
thank you very much for this information. I now know that it is safer
to use tryCatch() to test for this.
Details: I have a function pn - getReadablePathname(pn) that I use to
assess that a pathname (which also follows Windows Shortcuts) passed
to a function specifies a file that exists and
yes, this was just a parallel build within one package.
Thanks very much for your help.
-Whit
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 6:01 AM, Uwe Ligges
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On Mon, 1 Dec 2008, Uwe Ligges wrote:
Peter Dalgaard wrote:
Whit Armstrong wrote:
I have a
On Dec 1, 2008, at 6:38 PM, Laurent Gautier wrote:
Simon Urbanek wrote:
On Dec 1, 2008, at 6:11 AM, Laurent Gautier wrote:
Stefan Evert wrote:
The steps needed to generate the error are:
- install a binary distribution of R (default location)
- add R to the PATH
Did you actually add
18 matches
Mail list logo
