>>> Could you remind me what xtfrm stands for?
>>
>> No, I don't think I ever worked it out. :-)
>
> The same logic as strxfrm.
strxfrm is short for string transform.
=> stxfrm is short for string tansform
=> txfrm is short for tansform
=> xtfrm is short of snatform?
Hadley
--
http://had.co.nz/
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 03/02/2010 7:20 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
Currently, for numeric a you can do either
order(-a)
or
order(a, decreasing=FALSE)
For nonnumeric types like POSIXct and factors only
the latter works.
Under my proposal your
order(a, -b, c, d)
would b
[reposting after holiday period]
-- Forwarded message --
From: Felix Andrews
Date: 21 December 2009 23:44
Subject: proposal for new axis.Date/axis.POSIXct
To: r-devel@r-project.org
Hi R-devel.
I've noticed a couple of quirks in the current time/date axis
functions (axis.Date, a
On 03/02/2010 7:20 PM, Hadley Wickham wrote:
Currently, for numeric a you can do either
order(-a)
or
order(a, decreasing=FALSE)
For nonnumeric types like POSIXct and factors only
the latter works.
Under my proposal your
order(a, -b, c, d)
would be
order(a, b, c, d, decreasing=c(FALSE,TRU
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Murdoch [mailto:murd...@stats.uwo.ca]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 4:17 PM
> To: William Dunlap
> Cc: Hadley Wickham; r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Proposal unary - operator for factors
>
> On 03/02/2010 6:49 PM, William Dunlap wrot
>> Currently, for numeric a you can do either
>> order(-a)
>> or
>> order(a, decreasing=FALSE)
>> For nonnumeric types like POSIXct and factors only
>> the latter works.
>>
>> Under my proposal your
>> order(a, -b, c, d)
>> would be
>> order(a, b, c, d, decreasing=c(FALSE,TRUE,FALSE,TRUE))
On 03/02/2010 6:49 PM, William Dunlap wrote:
-Original Message-
From: h.wick...@gmail.com [mailto:h.wick...@gmail.com] On
Behalf Of Hadley Wickham
Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:38 PM
To: William Dunlap
Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
Subject: Re: [Rd] Proposal unary - operator for fact
> -Original Message-
> From: h.wick...@gmail.com [mailto:h.wick...@gmail.com] On
> Behalf Of Hadley Wickham
> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:38 PM
> To: William Dunlap
> Cc: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Rd] Proposal unary - operator for factors
>
> > It wouldn't make sense
> It wouldn't make sense in the context of
> vector[-factor]
True, but that doesn't work currently so you wouldn't lose anything.
However, it would make a certain class of problem that used to throw
errors become silent.
> Wouldn't it be better to allow order's decreasing argument
> to be a vec
> -Original Message-
> From: r-devel-boun...@r-project.org
> [mailto:r-devel-boun...@r-project.org] On Behalf Of Hadley Wickham
> Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2010 3:10 PM
> To: r-devel@r-project.org
> Subject: [Rd] Proposal unary - operator for factors
>
> Hi all,
>
> Why not make the
Hi all,
Why not make the unary minus operator return the factor with levels
reversed? This would make it much easier to sort factors in
descending order in part of an order statement.
Hadley
--
http://had.co.nz/
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
I omitted to mention that when I set KMP_DUPLICATE_LIB_OK=TRUE and
OMP_NUM_THREADS=1, I consistently get this error instead:
OMP: Error #13: Assertion failure at kmp_csupport.c(465).
OMP: Hint: Please submit a bug report with this message, compile and run
commands used, and machine configuration
Hi all,
I have some C++ code that I call from my package. In my main C++ loop, I check
for user interrupts and return to the R shell after ensuring I've deallocated
memory appropriately. This works fine when the code is compiled with gcc+openmp
and with icc without openmp, but when I compile wi
Full_Name: Oliver Heil
Version: 2.10.0
OS: debian squeeze
Submission from: (NULL) (193.174.58.251)
When running mclapply on a list of strings with a length of 618 on 10 cores the
resulting data is wrong every 10 entries starting with the 6th. Our machine has
16 cores.
You may reproduce the error
On 2/1/2010 3:57 PM, Brian Diggs wrote:
> The following code:
>
> cut(as.POSIXct("2009-11-01 04:00:00", tz="America/Los_Angeles"), "1 day")
>
> gives the error:
>
> Error in seq.int(0, to - from, by) : 'to' must be finite
>
> This is related to November 1st, 2009 being the switchover date from
A number of packages do this. See e.g. 'sm' and its function
sm.options() for one implementation.
On Wed, 3 Feb 2010, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
On 03/02/2010 8:07 AM, Chris Brien wrote:
Dear all,
I am developing a package foo that has a namespace. I would like to be able
to provide an option,
On 03/02/2010 8:07 AM, Chris Brien wrote:
Dear all,
I am developing a package foo that has a namespace. I would like to be able to provide an option, say opt, that
1) is set to a default value when the package is loaded
2) can be set to a different value by the package user
3) is used by func
Dear all,
I am developing a package foo that has a namespace. I would like to be able to
provide an option, say opt, that
1) is set to a default value when the package is loaded
2) can be set to a different value by the package user
3) is used by functions within the package
How can I achieve
Hello,
I would like to organize the "R" directory in my home-grown package into
sub-directories, but "R CMD --build" doesn't seem to find *.R files below
the actual source directory. Is there any way around that?
Thanks, Joh
__
R-devel@r-project.org
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:37:46PM +0100, Petr Savicky wrote:
> I would like to add some more information concerning the patch C
> to the function choose() proposed in the email
> https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2009-December/056177.html
>
> The patch uses transformations of choose(n, k),
20 matches
Mail list logo
