Re: [Rd] Rubbish values written with zero-length vectors (PR#14217)

2010-02-21 Thread Peter Dalgaard
s...@userprimary.net wrote: Thanks, Seth. Martin Morgan sent a patch for a few lines above yours, which I didn't have a chance to review until now: - if (!isVectorList(x) LENGTH(y) 1) - error(_(more elements supplied than there are to replace)); + if (!isVectorList(x) LENGTH(y)

Re: [Rd] Rubbish values written with zero-length vectors (PR#14217)

2010-02-21 Thread Peter Dalgaard
OK. I now have a version which seems to do the trick and reuses an existing error message. Will commit to r-devel if and when make check-devel succeeds. -p Peter Dalgaard wrote: s...@userprimary.net wrote: Thanks, Seth. Martin Morgan sent a patch for a few lines above yours, which I didn't

Re: [Rd] system.time provides inaccurate sys.child (PR#14210)

2010-02-21 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
FYI, you're much more likely to get a response/see actions on this if you report issues using the most recent stable version (R v2.10.1) and/or even the developers version (R v2.11.0). You're current version is, as you see, more than 2 years old. It is likely that the threshold to compare the

Re: [Rd] system.time provides inaccurate sys.child (PR#14210)

2010-02-21 Thread Peter Dalgaard
Henrik Bengtsson wrote: FYI, you're much more likely to get a response/see actions on this if you report issues using the most recent stable version (R v2.10.1) and/or even the developers version (R v2.11.0). You're current version is, as you see, more than 2 years old. It is likely that the

Re: [Rd] system.time provides inaccurate sys.child (PR#14210)

2010-02-21 Thread p . dalgaard
Henrik Bengtsson wrote: FYI, you're much more likely to get a response/see actions on this if you report issues using the most recent stable version (R v2.10.1) and/or even the developers version (R v2.11.0). You're current version is, as you see, more than 2 years old. It is likely that

Re: [Rd] R logo as SVG ?

2010-02-21 Thread Barry Rowlingson
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 7:56 PM, Jens Elkner je...@cs.uni-magdeburg.de wrote: Yes and scaling would be too resource consuming as well (very bad for menus, etc.). I think, the most challenging part here is all the [different type of] shadows. So does anybody know, who made  the original pixel

Re: [Rd] R logo as SVG ?

2010-02-21 Thread baptiste auguie
On 21 February 2010 14:48, Barry Rowlingson b.rowling...@lancaster.ac.uk wrote: A while ago I played around with creating a new R logo using vector graphics. I took the current logo as a starting point. Here's some samples on different coloured backgrounds:

Re: [Rd] R CMD check: OK in LINUX. Crashes in Windows!

2010-02-21 Thread rt
There seem to be some issues with Windows 7 user accounts (1) Windows 7 64bit: User Account Check.log - failed examples sh.exe: The application was unable to start correctly (0Xc142) Even when CMD.exe and sh.exe are run under admin privilege. This is however not consistent. Sh.exe

Re: [Rd] R CMD check: OK in LINUX. Crashes in Windows!

2010-02-21 Thread rt
Hi, C code for this problem is embedded. I am not clear about the R_interface.c. I would appreciate if someone could point out problems that may lead to sporadic problems? Thanks, Russ //c_mat.h typedef struct cMatrix { int m; int n; double *d; } c_mat; //c_mat.c

Re: [Rd] Where does install.R go when R gets compiled? Or, how to experiment with changes to install.R?

2010-02-21 Thread Duncan Murdoch
Paul Johnson wrote: Hello, everybody. I apologize if this is obvious. I've not tried to make changes in R code within the R source itself before. I'm pursuing an experiment to make RPM files for R packages on-the-fly. Any time I install an R package successfully, I want to wrap up those files

Re: [Rd] Problem with ?Syntax

2010-02-21 Thread Duncan Murdoch
Gabor Grothendieck wrote: I wasn't claiming there was an ambiguity but it does not perform according to the operator precedence documented in ?Syntax . If it performed as documented it would give an error. There are a few other errors in that page, e.g. saying that [ has greater priority

Re: [Rd] Problem with ?Syntax

2010-02-21 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 21/02/2010 12:44 PM, Duncan Murdoch wrote: Gabor Grothendieck wrote: I wasn't claiming there was an ambiguity but it does not perform according to the operator precedence documented in ?Syntax . If it performed as documented it would give an error. There are a few other errors in that