Hi,
I'm getting a segmentation fault as follows:
------
R> begt <- as.POSIXct(strptime("10/01/2009 06:00:00", format="%d/%m/%Y
%H:%M:%S"),
+tz="GMT")
R> tser <- seq(begt, by=5, length.out=91000)
R> tser.trun
Thanks. With help from Matthias I discovered that I was using the wrong
RUnit docs.
I was using the Nov. 25, 2009 paper by Matthias and two others instead of
the online RUnit package docs, where a more robust regular expression
appears.
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Romain Francois
wrote:
> Le
Duncan Murdoch-2 wrote:
>
> You can use the Rtools for the stuff other than the compilers. You need
> the MinGW 64 bit versions of the compilers; they are not nicely packaged
> yet, but the instructions for finding them are in the new version of the
> R-admin manual, in the section 3.3, "Bui
On 22/04/2010 3:04 PM, Sharpie wrote:
Hello R developers,
I sincerely apologize if the answer to this question is clearly documented
somewhere, but I was unable to figure it out over my morning coffee.
I just downloaded today's release of R 2.11.0 and installed it on my Windows
7 64 bit VM. I
Hello R developers,
I sincerely apologize if the answer to this question is clearly documented
somewhere, but I was unable to figure it out over my morning coffee.
I just downloaded today's release of R 2.11.0 and installed it on my Windows
7 64 bit VM. I also downloaded the latest version of R
Romain has already given you the answer. As would have the help page
?defineTestSuite
Not a bug, but a user error, I assume.
Matthias
Dominick Samperi wrote, On 04/22/10 02:19:
> There appears to be a bug in RUnit.
>
> Given a testsuite testsuite.math, say, when I run:
>
> runTestSuite(test
On Apr 22, 2010, at 7:12 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote:
>
> Is this a thumbs up for memcpy for DUPLICATE_ATOMIC_VECTOR at least ?
>
> If there is further specific testing then let me know, happy to help, but
> you seem to have beaten me to it.
>
I was not volunteering to do anything - I was just l
On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Peter Dalgaard wrote:
> ...
>>> I.e., that R reverts to using indicator variables when the intercept is
>>> absent.
>>
>> Is there any nice way of getting contr.sum coding for th
Just to add some clarification, the suggestion wasn't motivated by speeding
up a length 3 vector being recycled 3.3 million times. But its a good point
that any change should not make that case slower. I don't know how much
vectorCopy is called really, DUPLICATE_ATOMIC_VECTOR seems more
sig
Is this a thumbs up for memcpy for DUPLICATE_ATOMIC_VECTOR at least ?
If there is further specific testing then let me know, happy to help, but
you seem to have beaten me to it.
Matthew
"Simon Urbanek" wrote in message
news:65d21b93-a737-4a94-bdf4-ad7e90518...@r-project.org...
>
> On Apr 21
Le 22/04/10 02:19, Dominick Samperi a écrit :
There appears to be a bug in RUnit.
Given a testsuite testsuite.math, say, when I run:
runTestSuite(testsuite.math)
this works fine, provided there are no extraneous files in the
unit test subdirectory.
But if there are any Emacs temp files (with
11 matches
Mail list logo
