On May 24, 2010, at 2:59 PM, Peter Holt wrote:
Hi All,
I created a .R file with source code that accesses functions from a R
package (example, fTrading).
I then run the created application in two different configurations:
1. I started a R session, and then ran the application using
Just curious: is there a particular reason why install.packages()
gives a warning in normal use when 'lib' is not specified (e.g. argument
'lib' is missing: using '/usr/local/lib/R/site-library' )? It would
seem to me that this is normal behavior as documented ( If missing,
defaults to the
Hi all,
I'm building R for a context where I can't load dynamic libraries. I've
configured the build appropriately but from what I can tell it's not
currently supported: there are compile errors here and there and the
mechanism for looking up base symbols (CFunTab in Rdynload.c??) seems to
have
On 25/05/10 23:25 PM, Ben Bolker bol...@ufl.edu wrote:
Just curious: is there a particular reason why install.packages()
gives a
warning in normal use when 'lib' is not specified (e.g. argument
'lib' is
missing: using '/usr/local/lib/R/site-library' )? It would
seem to me that
this is
Hi,
Just wondering whether anyone had thought about moving the R sources
to a distributed version control system such as Bazaar, Git or
Mercurial. These new generation systems make it easier to work on
feature branches, allow working offline, are very fast, etc.
Some projects that have moved to
On second thoughts it is really none of my business how the R sources
are managed.
But I would encourage package developers and/or r-forge maintainers to
consider these systems.
Regards
-Felix
On 26 May 2010 10:29, Felix Andrews fe...@nfrac.org wrote:
Hi,
Just wondering whether anyone had
