This link may be of help as well...
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2008-November/051262.html
HTH
Jeff
On 4/24/12 12:35 PM, "oliver" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>OK, thanks for the information...
>
>
>On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:02:33PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>>
>> On 24 April 2012 at 1
On 24-Apr-2012 17:23:00 Andrew Redd wrote:
> I go back and forth between windows and linux, and find myself
> running into problem with line endings. Is there a way to
> control the line ending conversion when writing files, such as
> write and cat? More explicitly I want to be able to write files
On 24/04/2012 1:23 PM, Andrew Redd wrote:
I go back and forth between windows and linux, and find myself running
into problem with line endings. Is there a way to control the line
ending conversion when writing files, such as write and cat? More
explicitly I want to be able to write files with
Hello,
OK, thanks for the information...
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:02:33PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>
> On 24 April 2012 at 12:39, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
> | On 24/04/2012 12:31 PM, oliver wrote:
> | > Hello,
> | >
> | > what if I want to write a package mixed R/C-extension
> | > and wa
I go back and forth between windows and linux, and find myself running
into problem with line endings. Is there a way to control the line
ending conversion when writing files, such as write and cat? More
explicitly I want to be able to write files with LF line endings
rather than CRLF line ending
On 24 April 2012 at 12:39, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| On 24/04/2012 12:31 PM, oliver wrote:
| > Hello,
| >
| > what if I want to write a package mixed R/C-extension
| > and want to use code that is provided by other peoples packages?
| >
| > How for example can I use one of the provided wavelet packa
> Is it possible to keep from triggering the following warning
> when I check the package?
>
> summary:
> function(object, ...)
> summary.agriculture:
> function(x, analyte.names, results.col, analyte.col, by, det.col,
> [clip]
Part of the solution is to add ... to the legacy function; that
I am developing a custom regression package, which accepts a formula object
as way of setting up the model matrix and response variable from a data
frame. For large data sets, I expect that going through R memory might be
too slow, so I'm thinking about reading the data directly into C (e.g. from
a
On 24/04/2012 12:31 PM, oliver wrote:
Hello,
what if I want to write a package mixed R/C-extension
and want to use code that is provided by other peoples packages?
How for example can I use one of the provided wavelet packages
from within my C-based R-extension?
Somehow I would need to load th
Hello,
what if I want to write a package mixed R/C-extension
and want to use code that is provided by other peoples packages?
How for example can I use one of the provided wavelet packages
from within my C-based R-extension?
Somehow I would need to load the other packages and have access to the
Looking at the source code (src/library/tools/R/check.R and
src/library/tools/R/QC.R), I found that...
WORKAROUND:
You can trick 'R CMD check' to quickly skip the
"check_package_CRAN_incoming" test by providing it with invalid URLs
to repositories by setting system environment
'_R_CHECK_XREFS_REPO
Dear R developers,
I am writing a R module, which contains a function that needs support data (a
table with two columns).
I wonder how to make sure the data is available to the function, without making
the function reload the data each time it is executed. Is it what the lazy
mechanism takes car
I am compiling a library with legacy code which has functions named with
periods in the names - but are not S3 class functions.For example for
example, summary.agriculture is not an extension of the summary function for
and 'agriculture. class object - it is just poorly named.
Is it pos
On 24/04/2012 14:36, Wincent wrote:
Hi all,
The nobs method of (MASS:::polr class) takes into account of weight,
but nobs method of glm does not. I wonder what is the rationale of
such design behind nobs.glm. Thanks in advance. Best Regards.
library(MASS)
house.plr<- polr(Sat ~ Infl + Type +
Hi all,
The nobs method of (MASS:::polr class) takes into account of weight,
but nobs method of glm does not. I wonder what is the rationale of
such design behind nobs.glm. Thanks in advance. Best Regards.
> library(MASS)
> house.plr <- polr(Sat ~ Infl + Type + Cont, weights = Freq, data = housi
On 23/04/2012 17:39, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
On 18/04/2012 16:04, Joshua Ulrich wrote:
Hi Renaud,
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Renaud Gaujoux
wrote:
Hi Henrik,
Could anybody behind a proxy check if the issue can be reproduced?
My proxy is in fact provided by cntml, which acts as
Thanks Patrick, this is a nice solution. Regarding a patch I'm inclined
to believe you're correct, though it is certainly something to consider.
Cheers,
Cole
On 04/20/2012 07:55 PM, Patrick Aboyoun wrote:
Cole,
Bioconductor's high throughput sequencing infrastructure package IRanges
contains
17 matches
Mail list logo
