On 06/06/2012 21:04, peter dalgaard wrote:
FYI, Brian has backed out the changes to identical() in r59533 of R-patched.
Please retry your test codes with the new version. (Due to some ISP mess-up,
Brian is temporarily unable to reply in detail himself.)
-pd
Some comments (now my ISP has
Henrik Bengtsson hb at biostat.ucsf.edu writes:
See also R-devel '[Rd] Suggestion for memory optimization and
as.double() with friends', March 28-29 2007
[https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-devel/2007-March/045109.html].
/Henrik
Interesting thread. So we have you to thank for instigating
On 07/06/2012 11:12, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Prof Ripley wrote :
(AFAIK the CRAN binary package providers expect users to be
using the current version of R.)
I guess it's quite common practice for very many users to fail that
expectation. I for one do. I'm used to seeing Warning: packagex was
Prof Ripley wrote :
That Depends line is about source installs.
I can't see that documented in either Writing R Extensions or
?install.packages. Is it somewhere else? I thought Depends applied to
binaries from CRAN too, which is the default method on Windows and Mac.
Matthew
On 07/06/2012 11:40, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Prof Ripley wrote :
That Depends line is about source installs.
I can't see that documented in either Writing R Extensions or
?install.packages. Is it somewhere else? I thought Depends applied to
binaries from CRAN too, which is the default method on
On 07/06/2012 11:40, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Prof Ripley wrote :
That Depends line is about source installs.
I can't see that documented in either Writing R Extensions or
?install.packages. Is it somewhere else? I thought Depends applied to
binaries from CRAN too, which is the default method
On 07/06/2012 12:49, Matthew Dowle wrote:
On 07/06/2012 11:40, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Prof Ripley wrote :
That Depends line is about source installs.
I can't see that documented in either Writing R Extensions or
?install.packages. Is it somewhere else? I thought Depends applied to
binaries
On Jun 7, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Matthew Dowle wrote:
On 07/06/2012 11:40, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Prof Ripley wrote :
That Depends line is about source installs.
I can't see that documented in either Writing R Extensions or
?install.packages. Is it somewhere else? I thought Depends applied to
On 07/06/2012 12:49, Matthew Dowle wrote:
On 07/06/2012 11:40, Matthew Dowle wrote:
Prof Ripley wrote :
That Depends line is about source installs.
I can't see that documented in either Writing R Extensions or
?install.packages. Is it somewhere else? I thought Depends applied to
binaries
Hello all - first time poster long time reader,
I'm currently working on a package, and was interested to compare
performance with and without gcc/g++ -O based optimization. I can turn the
-O flags off with a ~.R/Makevars file, but when I do something odd happens.
The package installs fine when
On Jun 7, 2012, at 1:32 PM, alexholehouse wrote:
Hello all - first time poster long time reader,
I'm currently working on a package, and was interested to compare
performance with and without gcc/g++ -O based optimization. I can turn the
-O flags off with a ~.R/Makevars file, but when I do
Simon Urbanek wrote
Is this your real Makevars? That would override all R settings and break a
lot of things ... You should not set anything other than PKG_xx flags in
Makevars since the regular flags are taken from R. Providing the source
of package.tar.gz would give us more insight on
The X11 device driver does not provide the X window manager with an icon
(_NET_WM_ICON) or, under some circumstances, with a class (WM_CLASS).
This hinders usability under the new stable version of Ubuntu, which has
a (new) user interface centered around icons.
I am not sure if this was a
I built R-trunk (rev 59537), ran 'Rtrunk CMD build data.table',
installed the resulting tar.gz into R release and it ran tests ok. So it
seems ok now, if that tested it right. Will check R-Forge again when it
catches up. Thanks.
Matthew
On Wed, 2012-06-06 at 22:04 +0200, peter dalgaard wrote:
14 matches
Mail list logo
