[Bioc-devel] oneChannelGUI devel

2013-10-03 Thread rcaloger
Hi Martin, I went to the devel 2.13 of Bioconductor this morning to check if everything was ok with oneChannelGUI, the package I am maintaining and I did not find it. I have done some commitments in the last period to the devel and I did not get any error, so it seems strange to me that my

Re: [Bioc-devel] oneChannelGUI devel

2013-10-03 Thread Dan Tenenbaum
- Original Message - From: rcaloger raffaele.calog...@gmail.com To: raffaele calogero raffaele.calog...@unito.it, bioc-devel@r-project.org Cc: rcaloger raffaele.calog...@gmail.com Sent: Thursday, October 3, 2013 6:06:33 PM Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] oneChannelGUI devel On 10/4/13

[Bioc-devel] New pvectorize implementation

2013-10-03 Thread Ryan
Hi Martin, I've just completed a proof-of-concept for a version of pvectorize that can handle functions with multiple vector arguments: https://github.com/DarwinAwardWinner/BiocParallel/compare/mllg:batchjobs...pvectorize It's just a proof of concept right now, and my branch includes some

Re: [Rd] predictions in nlme without fixed covariantes

2013-10-03 Thread Prof Brian Ripley
This should be fixed in nlme 3.1-112. However, nlme has little support for formulae such as resp ~ 0, and does things like p:1 where p is the number of columns in the model matrix. 3.1-112 does better but evidently the design did not consider this possibility. On 30/09/2013 13:42,

Re: [Rd] version comparison puzzle

2013-10-03 Thread Martyn Plummer
It's an underflow problem. When comparing versions, a.b.c is converted first to the integer vector c(a,b,c) and then to the double precision value a + b/base + c/base^2 where base is 1 greater than the largest integer component of any of the versions: i.e 99912 in this case. The last term

Re: [Rd] version comparison puzzle

2013-10-03 Thread Jari Oksanen
Actually, Bob O'Hara had a blog post about this in August 2012: http://occamstypewriter.org/boboh/2012/08/17/lme4_destined_to_become_stable_through_rounding/ The concluding chapter reads: I have been worried that lme4 will never become stable, but this latest version mollifies me with the

[Rd] check warning with .onLoad() and setClass()

2013-10-03 Thread Rainer M Krug
Hi I am writing a package in which I define a new class in the .onLoad() hook: , | .onLoad - function(libname, pkgname) { | setClass( | inDrak, | representation( | init = SpatialGridDataFrame | ), | contains = simObj | ) | } `

Re: [Rd] check warning with .onLoad() and setClass()

2013-10-03 Thread John Chambers
Don't use .onLoad() to set class (or other nontrivial) information at load time. Use setLoadActions(), which was created exactly to get around the limitations of .onLoad(). For an example, see the Rcpp package, which uses this to set up load-time C++ linkages. John Chambers On Oct 3, 2013,

[Rd] Including R code from another package...

2013-10-03 Thread Jonathan Greenberg
R-developers: I had a quick question for the group -- let's say a package I am developing depends on a single, small function from a large CRAN-listed package. I can, of course, set a dependency within my own package, but are there means by which I can include the R script + man file DIRECTLY in

Re: [Rd] Including R code from another package...

2013-10-03 Thread Greg Snow
If the package is on CRAN then the license should be a free one that would let you copy whatever you want from it. However it would be most polite to contact the original author first. I know that I have given permission for a couple of my functions to be included in other packages where it

Re: [Rd] Including R code from another package...

2013-10-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 03.10.2013 21:39, Greg Snow wrote: If the package is on CRAN then the license should be a free one that would let you copy whatever you want from it. That is not true for all CRAN packages. However it would be most polite to contact the original author first. I know that I have given

Re: [Rd] R-3.0.2 - Win7_64 - alone_decoder.c: Permission denied error

2013-10-03 Thread Uwe Ligges
On 30.09.2013 19:47, Adler, Avraham wrote: Hello. When trying to compile R-3.0.2 on Windows 7 64bit, I get an error relating to alone_decoder.c: Permission denied. The entire error code is copied below. gcc -std=gnu99 -m64 -shared -o Riconv.dll Riconv.def win_iconv.o touch

[Rd] [PATCH] file.access returns success for NA

2013-10-03 Thread Scott Kostyshak
Currently on R I get the following: file.access(c(doesNotExist, NA)) doesNotExist NA -10 where 0 means success. Is the 0 correct? I was expecting either NA or -1. ?file.access does not mention how NA values should be handled. The subsection 3.3.4 NA handling from the R Language