Yes, this may work, but this way I have to have one test per file,
which is not very convenient.
---
Alexey
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:43 PM, Hadley Wickham h.wick...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're using roxygen2, you can use @example tag to include an
external file into the examples.
Hadley
On 20 Jan 2014, at 09:31, Federico Calboli f.calb...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 18 Jan 2014, at 14:31, Axel Urbiz axel.ur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm planning to submit my first package to R, and although I read all the
documentation, I'm not very clear on the following 2 items, from
On 18 Jan 2014, at 14:31, Axel Urbiz axel.ur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm planning to submit my first package to R, and although I read all the
documentation, I'm not very clear on the following 2 items, from which I'd
appreciate your guidance:
1)I understand it is suggested to
The problem with extracting a single test from a file is going to be
locating the relevant lines of code and cleanly pulling them out
(along with any needed supporting code). It might be better to attack
the problem in the opposite direction by having a roxygen2 directive
that inserted the block
I don't know where you have gdb from, but it is not included in the latest
xcode, afaik.
If you install it by hand, or from brew, then you'll see what I saw.
Maybe you have a gdb version from an older xcode lying around, or I don't
know. See also
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Federico Calboli
f.calb...@imperial.ac.ukwrote:
[...]
Is it? this is news to me. I have a grand total of 2 packages up and I
never ever used R-devel, and never ever had a problem, had a report of a
problem or had a note from CRAn about my packages not being
On 20 Jan 2014, at 14:51, Gábor Csárdi csardi.ga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Federico Calboli f.calb...@imperial.ac.uk
wrote:
[...]
Is it? this is news to me. I have a grand total of 2 packages up and I
never ever used R-devel, and never ever had a problem, had
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Federico Calboli
f.calb...@imperial.ac.ukwrote:
[...]
I do that *with the current release of R* and I never had an issue
whatsoever. Incidentally the words 'This should be done with the current
version of R-devel (or if that is not possible, current R-patched
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 10:34 AM, Federico Calboli f.calb...@imperial.ac.uk
wrote:
[...]
That's as interesting as the English language makes it -- please note of
the expression 'should' as opposed to 'must', and the list of three options
of R versions.
Well, my interpretation is that
On 20 Jan 2014, at 00:00 , Duncan Murdoch murdoch.dun...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone might want to fix this by implementing a full syntax for complex
constants, but meanwhile, I think a passable workaround could be
That might be nice to do. Not sure if it's easy or hard...
I think it's
On Jan 20, 2014, at 4:31 AM, Federico Calboli f.calb...@imperial.ac.uk wrote:
On 18 Jan 2014, at 14:31, Axel Urbiz axel.ur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
I'm planning to submit my first package to R, and although I read all the
documentation, I'm not very clear on the following 2 items,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 3:16 PM, peter dalgaard pda...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not formals() that is doing you in. Rather, it is a conspiration between
two things:
(a) R always displays complex constants as x+yi, even if x is zero and (b)
there really is no way to specify complex constants
You are probably wisest to follow Hadley's recommendation.
[library(fortunes); fortune(298)]
However, my help files contain various constructs of the
following form:
\dontshow{stopifnot(}
all.equal(fa, fa0)
\dontshow{)}
where fa is returned by a function, and fa0 is a
13 matches
Mail list logo
