Re: [R-pkg-devel] AppVeyor with LinkingTo: field

2017-02-13 Thread Gábor Csárdi
Indeed, I am sorry, misremembered. G. On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 4:36 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > (off-list) > > On 13 February 2017 at 15:11, Gábor Csárdi wrote: > | You need to put it in 'Imports' as well. Whatever is in LinkingTo, must > be > | in Imports. > > Not true. >

Re: [R-pkg-devel] AppVeyor with LinkingTo: field

2017-02-13 Thread Tim Keitt
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Tim Keitt wrote: > I am almost there -- only failing on devel in Travis CI. It failing at the > "R CMD build" phase. > > * installing *source* package ‘odeintr’ ... >> ** libs >> I/home/travis/R-bin/lib/R/include -DNDEBUG -I"../inst/include"

Re: [R-pkg-devel] AppVeyor with LinkingTo: field

2017-02-13 Thread Tim Keitt
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 10:36 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > Not true. > It seems to be a work-around for Travis, but as you say not a general packaging requirement. THK http://www.keittlab.org/ [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Re: [R-pkg-devel] AppVeyor with LinkingTo: field

2017-02-13 Thread Tim Keitt
On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 9:19 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > [1] http://eddelbuettel.github.io/r-travis/ > This looks useful. I'll have to investigate. THK http://www.keittlab.org/ [[alternative HTML version deleted]] __

Re: [R-pkg-devel] AppVeyor with LinkingTo: field

2017-02-13 Thread Gábor Csárdi
You need to put it in 'Imports' as well. Whatever is in LinkingTo, must be in Imports. Gabor On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Tim Keitt wrote: > My tests are failing on AppVeyor because BH is not available. How do I > force AppVeyor to install the package? It is in the

[Bioc-devel] covr

2017-02-13 Thread Estefania Mancini
Hi, I would like to add coverage test to my package. What should I do? Thanks in advance Estefania [[alternative HTML version deleted]] ___ Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

Re: [Rd] Pressing either Ctrl-\ of Ctrl-4 core dumps R

2017-02-13 Thread peter dalgaard
On 12 Feb 2017, at 23:54 , Henrik Bengtsson wrote: > I still don't understand why the terminal treats keypress Ctrl+4 the > same as Ctrl+\, but at least I'm not alone; > https://catern.com/posts/terminal_quirks.html#fn.3. I would guess that this was just to get