Do you get the same error if you try to build on the command line outside
of RStudio?
On Nov 28, 2017 3:51 PM, "Rampal Etienne" wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I updated RStudio, Rtools and R-devel, and then I tried to build a package
> in RStudio that I had been able to build
Dear all,
I updated RStudio, Rtools and R-devel, and then I tried to build a
package in RStudio that I had been able to build before without any
problems. But now I got the following error:
Updating SADISA documentatiob
Loading SADISA
Exited with status -1073741819.
That's all. What is this
On 28 November 2017 at 11:01, Ege Rubak wrote:
| The obvious place to look for pointers of how to detect and link
| correctly to fftw would be in the current CRAN package `fftwtools` that
| does it without any Rcpp:
| https://github.com/krahim/fftwtools
And there is also fftw by Olaf and Uwe
My local R-devel version now has (in ?lm)
Non-‘NULL’ ‘weights’ can be used to indicate that different
observations have different variances (with the values in
‘weights’ being inversely proportional to the variances); or
equivalently, when the elements of ‘weights’ are
Hi,
I have been having issues producing plots in JPEG format, using type =
"cairo" to get better anti-aliasing. When trying to set the physical
size with units = "cm" or units = "mm", the width is set correctly but
the height is not - it looks like the height is simply treated as
pixels regardless
It's on my todo list (for R-devel, it is not _that_ important), other things
just keep taking priority...
-pd
> On 28 Nov 2017, at 09:29 , Arie ten Cate wrote:
>
> Since the three posters agree (only) that there is a bug, I propose to
> file it as a bug, which is the
The obvious place to look for pointers of how to detect and link
correctly to fftw would be in the current CRAN package `fftwtools` that
does it without any Rcpp:
https://github.com/krahim/fftwtools
Cheers,
Ege
On 11/28/2017 02:47 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On 27 November 2017 at 21:24,
Since the three posters agree (only) that there is a bug, I propose to
file it as a bug, which is the least we can do now.
There is more to it: the only other case of a change in the Reference
Manual which I know of, is also about the weights option! This is in
coxph. The Reference Manual version