Hey all,
I have a question. My package builds perfectly on Linux and MacOS, but fails to
link my documentation correctly on Windows, which results in a warning.
The exact error which I get is:
Rd warning:
I forgot to add the .BBSoptions file should be located at the 'top' level of
the package, e.g., MTseekerData/.BBSoptions. You might as well add that now
instead of waiting until the packages are approved. I think the SPB was
modified to be aware of the .BBSoptions file so it may require it too
Hi Tim,
As Michael said, the usual case is the data package 'Suggests' the software and
the software 'Depends' or 'Imports' the data but this dependency could be
reversed.
When submitting a combo of packages to the SPB for review, the package that
'Suggests' is submitted first followed by the
> On 7 Oct 2018, at 16:04 , Rui Barradas wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I don't see why you say that the documentation seems to be wrong:
>
>
> class(args(`+`))
> #[1] "function"
>
>
> args() on a primitive does return a closure. At least in this case it does.
But in this case it doesn't:
>
Hello,
This is because args(`[`) returns NULL and class(NULL) is NULL.
So the question would be why is the return value of args(`[`) NULL?
Rui Barradas
Às 15:14 de 07/10/2018, Peter Dalgaard escreveu:
On 7 Oct 2018, at 16:04 , Rui Barradas wrote:
Hello,
I don't see why you say that the
Hello,
This is the *third* time I send this, the first two I had a failure
notice so if you have already received it please apologize.
I believe this is consistent with the doc.
From section Value:
formals returns the formal argument list of the function specified, as a
pairlist, or NULL
Note that having "function" in its class attribute does not make an object
a primitive.
For example:
> class(`[`)
[1] "function"
> is.primitive(`[`)
[1] TRUE
> class(`rnorm`)
[1] "function"
> is.primitive(`rnorm`)
[1] FALSE
Le dim. 7 oct. 2018 à 10:04, Rui Barradas a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> I
Hello,
I don't see why you say that the documentation seems to be wrong:
class(args(`+`))
#[1] "function"
args() on a primitive does return a closure. At least in this case it does.
Rui Barradas
Às 14:05 de 07/10/2018, Peter Dalgaard escreveu:
There is more "fun" afoot here, but I don't
There is more "fun" afoot here, but I don't recall what the point may be:
> args(get("+"))
function (e1, e2)
NULL
> args(get("["))
NULL
> get("[")
.Primitive("[")
> get("+")
function (e1, e2) .Primitive("+")
The other index operators, "[[", "[<-", "[[<-" are similar
The docs are pretty clear
