So the unique.default is from the R tools package during checks.
I don't see those issues on CRAN checks.
Exact environment where I am reproducing this issue is a fresh ubuntu,
no R packages pre-installed
docker pull registry.gitlab.com/jangorecki/dockerfiles/r-devel
Hi R developers,
On R-devel (2020-06-24 r78746) I am getting those two new exceptions
during R check. I found a change which eventually may be related
https://github.com/wch/r-source/commit/69de92b9fb1b7f2a7c8d1394b8d56050881a5465
I think this may be a regression. I grep'ed package manuals and R
Hi all,
I'm getting the following error from substring:
> substr("Jens Oehlschl\xe4gel-Akiyoshi", 1, 100)
Error in substr("Jens Oehlschl\xe4gel-Akiyoshi", 1, 100) :
invalid multibyte string at 'gel-A<6b>iyoshi'
Is that normal / intended? I've tried setting the Encoding/locale to
Latin-1/UTF-8
Consider the following expression, in which we pass 'i=', with no value
given for the 'i' argument, to lapply.
lapply("x", function(i, j) c(i=missing(i),j=missing(j), i=)
>From R-2.14.0 (2011-10-31) through R-3.4.4 (2018-03-15) this evaluated to
c(i=TRUE, j=FALSE). From R-3.5.0 (2018-04-23)
Thank you all for the help. I do ask a question about a package _outside of
CRAN yesterday. But I have new questions today about the global variable
undefined, which was read from an Rdata object.
Thank you for your kind help again.
Best,
Wei
-Original Message-
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel
On 26 June 2020 at 19:16, Zehao Xu wrote:
| Package suggested but not available for checking: 'actigraphy'
|
| ```
|
| This stackoverflow
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51453717/issue-with-r-package-check-on-windows-package-suggested-but-not-available-str
can solve you problem
No,
* The fourth can likely be addressed by if(getRversion() >= "2.15.1")
utils::globalVariables(c("IV", "M", "filename2id", "wear_flag"))
See https://github.com/tidyverse/magrittr/issues/29
* The fifth suggests you need to replace the default vignette title
with something specific to your package.
Well,
The first note can be ignored (Note that you are the maintainer),
the second one
```
Maintainer: 'Wei Guoi '
Authors@R: 'Wei Guo '
```
clearly, you miss spelled your name...
the third one,
```
checking package dependencies ... NOTE
Package suggested but not available for
Hi Shraddha,
I don't know what Java the build system uses, but I can reproduce the error
with Java 13. It's fine with Java 8 as you say.
I wont copy the whole error message as it's the same as I see on the build
system, but I do notice that in the middle I see:
Java 8 detected
This seems
Did you not post this before and receive answers? Please explain why the
previous answers were insufficient. "Some notes are not fixable" is not a
satisfactory response.
Bert Gunter
"The trouble with having an open mind is that people keep coming along and
sticking things into it."
-- Opus (aka
Good afternoon,
I am trying to submit my package to CRAN, and it failed to pass the checks due
to 5 notes. I am wondering how to fix it.
Within the 5 notes, some are not fixable.
Thanks.
Best,
Wei
Dear maintainer,
package postGGIR_2.0.0.tar.gz does not pass the incoming checks
Hi Martin,
Don't know how/where to implement a deprecation message that wouldn't be
confusing for the end users.
FWIW if the replacement of class Original with class New is just a
renaming (everything else remains the same), a situation I've dealt with
a lot in the
> On Jun 25, 2020, at 8:06 AM, Ivan Krylov wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Jun 2020 18:56:06 +
> Ryan Novosielski wrote:
>
> On my machine, getOption('expressions') is 5000 and the example from
> the test correctly stops with length(traceback()) == 2500. (And the
> simpler example of f <- function()
> On Jun 25, 2020, at 10:31 AM, Bjørn-Helge Mevik wrote:
>
> Signed PGP part
> Ryan Novosielski writes:
>
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I initially asked about this on r-help and was told this might be a better
>> venue. I’m not really convinced from reading the posting guide, but I’ll
>> give it a
Pkg A provides a (virtual) class "Original".
Pkg B creates a derived class setClass("Derived", contains = "Original")
Pkg A would like to deprecate "Original" and replace with "New".
Any ideas on how to implement a deprecation message so that the Pkg B
maintainer knows that their use of class
15 matches
Mail list logo