On 17 March 2021 at 22:53, Ben Bolker wrote:
|Thanks. I know it's supposed to Just Work (and I definitely
| appreciate all the work that's gone into making it Just Work 99% of the
| time!).
And for what it is worth, the aforementioned 'switching from within' solution
is using FlexiBLAS (n
Ben,
possibly useful project related to this
https://github.com/staticfloat/libblastrampoline
which is what Dirk referred to as the Julia state of art. It is actually much
more complex than it sounds because of differences in naming and ABI between
BLAS implementations, so simple switches don't
Thanks. I know it's supposed to Just Work (and I definitely
appreciate all the work that's gone into making it Just Work 99% of the
time!).
I tried --with-lapack, no joy.
Will try to decipher the rules file tomorrow ...
cheers
Ben
On 3/17/21 10:25 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
B
Ben,
This stuff has worked unchanged since the 1990s when we had a _really_ far
sighted fellow in Debian come up with the 'switch the links' scheme which was
(and is) subsequently deployed by many numerical applications within Debian,
R and e.g. Octave included.
And I used this ability to switc
I've been going around in circles trying to get BLAS-switching
working on a current r-devel, I'm sure I'm doing something dumb. Any
ideas about what I might be doing wrong, or suggestions for further
diagnosis, would be welcome!
tl;dr I am compiling R-devel with (to the best of my knowle
Comments in line
On 13/03/2021 09:50, SOEIRO Thomas wrote:
Dear list,
I have some questions/suggestions about reshape.
1) I think a good amount of the popularity of base::reshape alternative is due to the complexity of
reshape documentation. It is quite hard (at least it is for me) to figure
Thank you Neal. This is interesting. I will have a look at pqR.
Indeed radix only does C collation, I believe that is why it is not the
default choice for character ordering and sorting.
Not sure but I believe it can help address the following bugzilla item:
https://bugs.r-project.org/bugzilla/show
Getting back to this after 3 months :
> Martin Maechler
> on Wed, 16 Dec 2020 11:13:32 +0100 writes:
> Gabriel Becker
> on Mon, 14 Dec 2020 13:23:00 -0800 writes:
>> Hi Edgar, I certainly don't think quantile(x, .975) should
>> return 980, as that is a completel
