On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:13 AM Martin Maechler
wrote:
>
> > Gabriel Becker
> > on Tue, 4 May 2021 14:40:22 -0700 writes:
>
> > Hmm, that's fair enough Ben, I stand corrected. I will say that this
> seems
> > to be a pretty "soft" recommendation, as these things go, given that
It would almost trivial to make a wrapper tha first captures attributes, runs
median, and then returns the Re-attribute-ed value.
David.
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 5, 2021, at 8:29 AM, Gustavo Zapata Wainberg
> wrote:
>
> Hi, thanks Dr. Mächler for your prompt response!
>
> I agree with
Hi, thanks Dr. Mächler for your prompt response!
I agree with your explanations about this issue. But I was thinking of
something like adding an argument to median() and mean() that could keep
the attributes of the variables if set to TRUE.
Thanks again.
Best regards
El mar, 4 may 2021 a las 17
On 5 May 2021 at 05:42, Duncan Murdoch wrote:
| I think it would be useful to issue some kind of warning if tests are
| skipped. As mentioned earlier, this is impossible in user-contributed
| packages, which can only return OK or ERROR from their tests.
Seconded!
Dirk
--
https://dirk.eddel
On 05/05/2021 5:13 a.m., Martin Maechler wrote:
Gabriel Becker
on Tue, 4 May 2021 14:40:22 -0700 writes:
> Hmm, that's fair enough Ben, I stand corrected. I will say that this
seems
> to be a pretty "soft" recommendation, as these things go, given that it
> isn't tested fo
> Gabriel Becker
> on Tue, 4 May 2021 14:40:22 -0700 writes:
> Hmm, that's fair enough Ben, I stand corrected. I will say that this
seems
> to be a pretty "soft" recommendation, as these things go, given that it
> isn't tested for by R CMD check, including with the -as-c
