Ok, I see. It’s a nontrivial change, since the present setup (DEFMATH3_2 &
friends) only allows the real-valued function arguments to be vectorized. If
this is to be changed, all these macros would need to be rewritten. Case closed.
Best wishes,
Matthias
Von: Martin Maechler
Gesendet: Donnerst
> Sokol Serguei on Thu, 9 Dec 2021 17:13:36 +0100 writes:
> On 09/12/2021 16:55, Ben Bolker wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/9/21 10:03 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
Matthias Gondan
on Wed, 8 Dec 2021 19:37:09 +0100 writes:
>>>
>>> > Dear R deve
On 09/12/2021 16:55, Ben Bolker wrote:
On 12/9/21 10:03 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
Matthias Gondan
on Wed, 8 Dec 2021 19:37:09 +0100 writes:
> Dear R developers,
> I have seen that plogis silently ignores vector elements of
lower.tail,
and also of 'log'.
This is indeed the
On 12/9/21 10:03 AM, Martin Maechler wrote:
Matthias Gondan
on Wed, 8 Dec 2021 19:37:09 +0100 writes:
> Dear R developers,
> I have seen that plogis silently ignores vector elements of lower.tail,
and also of 'log'.
This is indeed the case for all d*, p*, q* functions.
Yes,
On 12/9/21 3:30 PM, Therneau, Terry M., Ph.D. via R-devel wrote:
The connected blog has the statement "Most authors will not have to do
anything as the
number of CRAN packages that will need some attention is below 1%, but authors
of packages
using native (C, C++ or Fortran) code should read
> Matthias Gondan
> on Wed, 8 Dec 2021 19:37:09 +0100 writes:
> Dear R developers,
> I have seen that plogis silently ignores vector elements of lower.tail,
and also of 'log'.
This is indeed the case for all d*, p*, q* functions.
Yes, this has been on purpose and therefore d
The connected blog has the statement "Most authors will not have to do
anything as the
number of CRAN packages that will need some attention is below 1%, but authors
of packages
using native (C, C++ or Fortran) code should read the following lines."
My packages do use a lot of C, but I never
