loaded via a namespace (and not attached):
[1] tools_2.12.0
I am running R on a Windows XP Box.
Thank you very much,
Carlos J. Gil Bellosta
http://www.datanalytics.com
__
R-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-devel
.
One of the purposes of the different R help lists should be serving as a
public relations platforms so as to promote the use of R.
Regards,
Carlos J. Gil Bellosta
http://www.datanalytics.com
On 08/21/2010 02:15 AM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 08/20/10 01:08 AM, Spencer Graves wrote:
What
Dear Abhijit,
If you think that table.CAPM is the culprit, you could run the call to
such function in R on both platforms using Rprof to check which part
of the function is producing the bottleneck.
Best regards,
Carlos J. Gil Bellosta
http://www.datanalytics.com
2010/5/19 Abhijit Bera abhib
it be possible to add an extra repository (or option) on
install.packages that would direct R to use the OS level package manager
(apt-get, yum or the like) so as to install the precompiled packages
from the distribution mirrors instead of the CRAN ones?
Best regards,
Carlos J. Gil Bellosta
http
here? I am sorry that I am very Windows-illiterate...
This is not something that worries me much per se, as I am
implementing some changes in the package and the new version does not
resemble the current one too much, but intrigues me quite a lot.
Best regards,
Carlos J. Gil Bellosta
http
box?
2) Is there any lesson to learn concerning cross-platform
implementation to learn from this case (there seems to be and I am
learning it, by the way).
Best regards and thank you for your comments on this issue.
Carlos J. Gil Bellosta
http://www.datanalytics.com
2009/7/30 Simon Urbanek
such a path somewhere...
Best regards,
Carlos J. Gil Bellosta
http://www.datanalytics.com
On Tue, 2009-07-28 at 16:53 -0400, Gabor Grothendieck wrote:
That's a check error. Did you try running R CMD CHECK on it?
Since it appears to happen in an example you could put
\dontrun{
...
}
around
