On February 29, 2020 at 5:06:35 PM, Rolf Turner (r.tur...@auckland.ac.nz)
wrote:
On 1/03/20 2:23 am, Hadley Wickham wrote:
> Is it down again? I'm seeing the same problem again.
> Hadley
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 2:41 PM Hadley Wickham
wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Is win-builder down? I
-35ba4a2677442e210c23a00a5601aba3
https://github.com/cran/fields/commit/9d9323471169a1a557415452432b8ca00d579329#diff-35ba4a2677442e210c23a00a5601aba3
https://github.com/cran/flexclust/commit/b455b290dde0917bb04ee73387e24d46546e0ecb#diff-35ba4a2677442e210c23a00a5601aba3
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 11:55 AM Max Kuhn
I've noticed a trend in the last year of a CRAN maintainer making
modifications to packages without notification to the package authors or
the community. Some times these have been made during a submission [1]
and, in other cases, for existing packages [2]. In the latter case, we
intuit that
t; The maintainer email bounces
> The maintainer is unresponsive to requests regarding the package from CRAN
> maintainers
>
> But I think that it is a good idea to include those conditions in the
> manuals.
>
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 9:30 AM Max Kuhn <mxk...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
The CRAN policy page
(https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/policies.html) implies that
there is a formal procedure for orphaning a package but none is
mentioned in the Extensions manual
(https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-devel/R-exts.html).
This page
I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research
task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least).
For example, roxygen2 is a tool that broadly enable reproducibility
but I see it more as a tool for better programming. I'm about to check
in a new version of the task view
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 1:05 PM, Achim Zeileis achim.zeil...@uibk.ac.at wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Achim Zeileis
achim.zeil...@uibk.ac.at wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
I've had a lot of requests for additions
On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 12:45 PM, Achim Zeileis
achim.zeil...@uibk.ac.at wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2015, Max Kuhn wrote:
I've had a lot of requests for additions to the reproducible research
task view that fall into a grey area (to me at least).
For example, roxygen2 is a tool that broadly
For a package, I need to write a csv version of a data set to an R
object. Right now, I use:
out - capture.output(
write.table(x,
sep = ,,
na = ?,
file =
Working on the caret package has exposed me to the wide variety of
approaches that different authors have taken to creating predictive
modeling functions (aka machine learning)(aka pattern recognition).
I suspect that many package authors are neophyte R users and are
stumbling through the process
I've been updating a package and, when installing a local devel
version, I get an error object 'confusionMatrix' not found whilst
loading namespace. Looking around online, it appears that this might
be related to loading a specific RData file, but it doesn't seem to be
the case AFAICT.
I've
, Max Kuhn mxk...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been updating a package and, when installing a local devel
version, I get an error object 'confusionMatrix' not found whilst
loading namespace. Looking around online, it appears that this might
be related to loading a specific RData file, but it doesn't seem
The link to
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/R-2.12.1.pkg
on the CRAN page
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/
is broken. Also, the email address for the webmaster is null (which is
why I'm emailing here).
Thanks,
Max
__
Peter and Simon,
That was the issue. Thanks,
Max
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Simon Urbanek
simon.urba...@r-project.org wrote:
On Feb 28, 2011, at 3:22 PM, Max Kuhn wrote:
The link to
http://cran.r-project.org/bin/macosx/R-2.12.1.pkg
on the CRAN page
http://cran.r-project.org
I'm checking packages under the devel version on OS X
sessionInfo()
R version 2.12.0 Under development (unstable) (2010-08-08 r52687)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0/x86_64 (64-bit)
I install packages via install.packages with type = source (I stick
to arch=x86_64). I've had no issues with
Professor Ripley,
R version 2.12.0 Under development (unstable) (2010-08-08 r52687)
Platform: x86_64-apple-darwin9.8.0/x86_64 (64-bit)
I install packages via install.packages with type = source (I stick
to arch=x86_64). I've had no issues with installs.
What is very strange is that you
My company is trying to manage R installations across a number large
SMP machines. We're thinking out the best way to manage the packages
installs and updates. They would be happy if we could work out RPM's
for package installations (traceable, easily facilitated with existing
sw management
I wasn't sure where to send this...
On the What's New section of the homepage, the Latest package link
points towards
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-packages/2008/date.html#end
It should probably point towards 2009.
Thanks,
Max
__
REvolution appear to be offering ParallelR only when bundled with their R
Enterprise edition. As such it appears to be non-free and closed source.
http://www.revolution-computing.com/products/parallel-r.php
Have you also looked at:
http://nws-r.sourceforge.net/
The core of their
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Philippe Grosjean
phgrosj...@sciviews.org wrote:
OK, then, I catch the practical point of view that is: nobody will use it
and we cannot force people to use it. So, it means that we should think
about tools to *automatically* generate a limited set of entries in
Everyone,
I've got code in my package that uses LogitBoost from the caTools
package. caTools does not have a namespace.
My package also uses loads RWeka, which has a namespace, and also has
a function called LogitBoost.
After loading both packages, how can I be specific about running the
On Dec 1, 2007 3:56 PM, Duncan Murdoch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My understanding is that Michael wants to have the Sweave options in a
chunk depend on a calculation happening in the underlying R session.
This is hard to do with hooks, because they are run after the options
have already been
22 matches
Mail list logo
