[Rd] Determining the size of a package

thout bothering the nice people at CRAN. Thanks. William Revellepersonality-project.org/revelle.html Professorpersonality-project.org Department of Psychology www.wcas.northwestern.edu/psych/ Northwestern Universitywww.northwestern.edu/

Re: [R-pkg-devel] help with revdep_check

s to be able to compile packages with C/C++/Fortran code. > > Gabor > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 7:02 PM William Revelle wrote: >> >> Dear friends, >> I am trying to release a new update to psych and psychTools and am having >> problems with revdep_check >>

[R-pkg-devel] help with revdep_check

uggestions would be appreciated. William Revellepersonality-project.org/revelle.html Professor personality-project.org Department of Psychology www.wcas.northwestern.edu/psych/ Northwestern Universitywww.northwe

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Guidance on splitting up an R package?

In 2019, I split psych into psych and psychTools to meet the 5MB space restriction. I moved several of vignettes, data sets, and a few helper functions over to psychTools. This mainly allowed for more vignettes but also allows me to add new data sets to psychTools without needing to recompile

[R-pkg-devel] size of package and splitting into 2

on this exercise, I would appreciate suggestions as to whether it is necessary (or at least useful). Thanks, Bill William Revellepersonality-project.org/revelle.html Professor personality-project.org Department of Psychology www.wcas.northwestern.edu

[Rd] diag(-1) produces weird result

-1) Error in diag(-1) : invalid 'nrow' value (< 0) Bill William Revellepersonality-project.org/revelle.html Professor personality-project.org Department of Psychology www.wcas.northwestern.edu/psych/ Northwestern Universitywww.northwester

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Warning: rBind is deprecated-- but I don't call it

r an answer does not > ensure that a reasonable answer can be extracted from a given body of data. ~ > John Tukey > /////////// > > > > 2018-03-21 21:12 GMT+01:00 William Revelle <li...@reve

Re: [R-pkg-devel] Warning: rBind is deprecated-- but I don't call it

of your code in an interactive session. > If any function uses rBind, you should notice as it will launch the > debugger. > Better ideas are welcome. > ++ > > Alex > > On 21 March 2018 at 19:36, William Revelle <li...@revelle.net> wrote: > > > Dear frie

[R-pkg-devel] Warning: rBind is deprecated-- but I don't call it

help would be appreciated. Thanks. Bill William Revellepersonality-project.org/revelle.html Professor personality-project.org Department of Psychology www.wcas.northwestern.edu/psych/ Northwestern Universitywww.northwestern.edu/ Use R for psychology

Re: [R-pkg-devel] author field in description problem

Uwe, Thanks. I was hoping that you would say that. Bill > On Feb 25, 2018, at 5:55 PM, Uwe Ligges <lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de> > wrote: > > > > On 26.02.2018 00:39, William Revelle wrote: >> I did remove the author and maintainer fields. I have only the

Re: [R-pkg-devel] author field in description problem

I did remove the author and maintainer fields. I have only the Authors@R field. However it still throws that Note (in R 3.4.3) > On Feb 25, 2018, at 5:20 PM, Iñaki Úcar <i.uca...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2018-02-25 23:49 GMT+01:00 William Revelle <li...@revelle.net>: >

[R-pkg-devel] author field in description problem

r74298) ) But, when I test with current R on a Mac or at win builder it throws a note: Author field differs from that derived from Authors@R Author:'William Revelle [aut, cre] (<https://orcid.org/-0003-4880-9610>)' Authors@R: 'William Revelle [aut, cre] (-0003-488

Re: [R-pkg-devel] R package test breakage catch 22

ckage-devel@r-project.org mailing list >> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel >> > > __ > R-package-devel@r-project.org mailing list > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-package-devel > William Revel

Re: [Rd] CRAN submit page down

Thanks. It is up again. Bill On Apr 26, 2015, at 12:53 PM, Uwe Ligges lig...@statistik.tu-dortmund.de wrote: On 26.04.2015 13:23, William Revelle wrote: This still seems to be the case. I tried uploading the most recent version of psych and got as far as the Step 3 page which

Re: [Rd] CRAN submit page down

William Revellehttp://personality-project.org/revelle.html Professor http://personality-project.org Department of Psychology http://www.wcas.northwestern.edu/psych/ Northwestern Universityhttp://www.northwestern.edu/ Use R for psychology

[Rd] How to test package on Solaris

result. I note from reading past queries to the list that this question has been asked before and the solution seems to have been some nice soul volunteering to test a particular package. A more general solution would seem preferred, if this is possible. Thanks. Bill William Revelle

[Rd] minor typo in biplot.rd

-darwin9.8.0/i386 (32-bit) locale: [1] en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8/C/C/en_US.UTF-8/en_US.UTF-8 attached base packages: [1] stats graphics grDevices utils datasets methods base other attached packages: [1] psych_1.0-93 loaded via a namespace (and not attached): [1] tools_2.13.0 -- William

[Rd] \code{\link{foo}} fails in 2.10.0

-- William Revelle http://personality-project.org/revelle.html Professor http://personality-project.org/personality.html Department of Psychology http://www.wcas.northwestern.edu/psych/ Northwestern University http://www.northwestern.edu/ Use R for psychology

Re: [Rd] \code{\link{foo}} fails in 2.10.0

attached packages: [1] psych_1.0-79 Bill At 12:44 PM -0400 8/25/09, Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 8/25/2009 11:59 AM, William Revelle wrote: I have noticed that many cross references in the help files using the \code{\link{foo}} command in the .Rd file fail to work in 2.10.0. Unfortunately