Re: [Rd] [External] anonymous functions

2020-12-08 Thread Gabor Grothendieck
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 12:34 PM wrote: > I don't disagree in principle, but the reality is users want shortcuts > and as a result various packages, in particular tidyverse, have been > providing them. Mostly based on formulas, mostly with significant > issues since formulas weren't designed for

Re: [Rd] [External] anonymous functions

2020-12-08 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 08/12/2020 6:21 a.m., Duncan Murdoch wrote: On 07/12/2020 12:26 p.m., luke-tier...@uiowa.edu wrote: I don't disagree in principle, but the reality is users want shortcuts and as a result various packages, in particular tidyverse, have been providing them. Mostly based on formulas, mostly

Re: [Rd] [External] anonymous functions

2020-12-08 Thread Duncan Murdoch
On 07/12/2020 12:26 p.m., luke-tier...@uiowa.edu wrote: I don't disagree in principle, but the reality is users want shortcuts and as a result various packages, in particular tidyverse, have been providing them. Mostly based on formulas, mostly with significant issues since formulas weren't

Re: [Rd] [External] anonymous functions

2020-12-07 Thread luke-tierney
I don't disagree in principle, but the reality is users want shortcuts and as a result various packages, in particular tidyverse, have been providing them. Mostly based on formulas, mostly with significant issues since formulas weren't designed for this, and mostly incompatible (tidyverse ones