Re: [Rd] Add a new environment variable switch for the 'large version' check

2020-04-16 Thread Jan Gorecki
For the same reason, handling false positive in CRAN checks, there are other places that could be improved. Like "size of tarball" NOTE. If one could control this size with an environment variable. Similarly to the proposal made by Jim. It would be useful as well. On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 5:06 PM H

Re: [Rd] Add a new environment variable switch for the 'large version' check

2020-04-16 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
I'd second Jim's feature request - it would be useful to be able to disable this in CI and elsewhere.The concept of using an "unusual" version component such as a very large number does a nice job of indicating "unusual" and serves as a blocker for submitting work-in-progress to CRAN by mistake

Re: [Rd] Add a new environment variable switch for the 'large version' check

2020-04-16 Thread Dirk Eddelbuettel
Or you use a fourth component to signal a development version as Rcpp has done for years (and, IIRC, for longer than devtools et al used '9000'). There is no functional difference between 1.2.3.1 and 1.2.3.9000. They are both larger than 1.2.3 (in the package_version() sense) and signal an inter

[Rd] Add a new environment variable switch for the 'large version' check

2020-04-15 Thread Jim Hester
If you test a package with `R CMD check --as-cran` one of the 'incoming' checks is for a large version number, it gives a NOTE like this * checking CRAN incoming feasibility ... NOTE Maintainer: ‘Jim Hester ’ Version contains large components (0.0.0.9000) This is a useful check when