rnately, you can ask that when used in such a pipeline that the user
> >> call all other arguments using names like data=whatever,
> >> mapping=aes(whatever) so no other args need to be adjusted by position.
> >>
> >> But all this is academic and I concede wil
g=aes(whatever) so no
other args need to be adjusted by position.
But all this is academic and I concede will likely not be done. I can live with
the plus signs.
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Murdoch
Sent: Sunday, December 6, 2020 2:50 PM
To: Avi Gross ; 'r-devel'
Subject: Re: [Rd]
us signs.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Duncan Murdoch
> Sent: Sunday, December 6, 2020 2:50 PM
> To: Avi Gross ; 'r-devel'
> Subject: Re: [Rd] New pipe operator and gg plotz
>
> Hadley's answer (#7 here:
> https://community.rstudio.com/t/why-cant-ggplot2-u
no
other args need to be adjusted by position.
But all this is academic and I concede will likely not be done. I can live with
the plus signs.
-Original Message-
From: Duncan Murdoch
Sent: Sunday, December 6, 2020 2:50 PM
To: Avi Gross ; 'r-devel'
Subject: Re: [Rd] New pipe operator
Hadley's answer (#7 here:
https://community.rstudio.com/t/why-cant-ggplot2-use/4372) makes it
pretty clear that he thinks it would have been nice now if he had made
that choice when ggplot2 came out, but it's not worth the effort now to
change it.
Duncan Murdoch
On 06/12/2020 2:34 p.m., Avi
As someone who switches back and forth between using standard R methods and
those of the tidyverse, depending on the problem, my mood and whether Jupiter
aligns with Saturn in the new age of Aquarius, I have a question about the
forthcoming built-in pipe. Will it motivate anyone to eventually
